-
Originally Posted by NotBelievingIt
Mirrors were also a lot less common way back.
Glass mirrors, perhaps, but there were plenty of other kinds. Like water.
If you don't know what you look like, you are less likely to actually care.
By that reasoning, we should expect most blind people to be unkempt in appearance. And yet, they aren't.
Plus, mass media that everyone reads and sees contains pictures of a small percentage of people who are well above average in genetic favoritism. Thus what you have to compare yourself against is highly biased towards "what looks good" and not what is normal.
And, of course, artists of previous eras never favored "people who are well above average in genetic favoritism."
-
this conversation is definitely making my hair grow longer .
-
Apologies that I have to be the one to break the gentleman's agreement of not posting in this topic unless something's happened, but I got a mail the weekend from Replicel talking about shares being traded and bought for some-or-other entity; quite frankly my brain switched off when I reached the second sentence.
Honestly the fact that we've not heard anything can mean one of two things: Either it's turned out to be such a roaring successful trial they're buying up all the shares they can and are planning to deliver the knock-out blow to hit the world by storm; or there's something that went wrong or the results are lackluster enough to force them to rethink their strategy and somehow put a positive spin on it.
Either way they're taking way too long to publish results for a safety trial.
-
Apologies that I have to be the one to break the gentleman's agreement of not posting in this topic unless something's happened, but I got a mail the weekend from Replicel talking about shares being traded and bought for some-or-other entity; quite frankly my brain switched off when I reached the second sentence.
Honestly the fact that we've not heard anything can mean one of two things: Either it's turned out to be such a roaring successful trial they're buying up all the shares they can and are planning to deliver the knock-out blow to hit the world by storm; or there's something that went wrong or the results are lackluster enough to force them to rethink their strategy and somehow put a positive spin on it.
Either way they're taking way too long to publish results for a safety trial.
-
You are reading too much into the lack of news.
Absence of Knowledge is not Knowledge of Absence.
-
Similar Threads
-
By tbtadmin in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 16
Last Post: 11-02-2011, 03:08 PM
-
By tbtadmin in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 98
Last Post: 10-04-2011, 05:16 AM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 0
Last Post: 09-06-2011, 02:30 PM
-
By Mojo Risin in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 15
Last Post: 07-24-2011, 11:33 PM
-
By RichardDawkins in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 12
Last Post: 06-15-2011, 03:31 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks