-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by UK_
why did you post that?
-
I believe he's suggesting that since "patients who have undergone previous conventional hair transplant surgery have been banned from clinical trials," then there is something going on. I would counter that in clinical trials in is pretty much protocol to have subjects who are not using medications, hair treatments, or who have had HTs. If they allowed them it would compromise the results of their trials because someone could question whether the products or the procedure they're testing was responsible. I assume the reason they "banned" HT patients if because they don't know how the procedure might work on scar tissue or in donor areas that have already had a procedure.
I hope their trials are successful and that it gets to the market soon, but I won't be holding my breath. Timelines for treatments are farcical.
Similar Threads
-
By gmonasco in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 4
Last Post: 07-14-2011, 05:09 PM
-
By gmonasco in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 2
Last Post: 06-17-2010, 01:56 PM
-
By gmonasco in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 6
Last Post: 04-20-2010, 06:28 AM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 1
Last Post: 03-15-2009, 11:30 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks