Histogen Results 9/15

[Losing_It]

As far as I understand they were suppose to present information about the two-year follow up for the initial trails which could be really interesting. This is just speculation, but maybe they had positive results at the 2 year mark and that is why they presented that data. Why else would they present that data?

[Jundam]

As far as I understand they were suppose to present information about the two-year follow up for the initial trails which could be really interesting. This is just speculation, but maybe they had positive results at the 2 year mark and that is why they presented that data. Why else would they present that data?

Probably true. I presumed that they were going to tell us that the effects of the initial HSC injection was still there at the 2-year mark and give us some dates related to the Phase 1/2 trials. I don't think anything marvelous was revealed but I'd still like to hear a summary of what they presented.

[Losing_It]

Probably true. I presumed that they were going to tell us that the effects of the initial HSC injection was still there at the 2-year mark and give us some dates related to the Phase 1/2 trials. I don't think anything marvelous was revealed but I'd still like to hear a summary of what they presented.

Yes I would view the hair that was produce with the initial injection to still be there after two years as positive result.

[Sogeking]

Yes I would view the hair that was produce with the initial injection to still be there after two years as positive result.

I concur...