Hasci (Gho) patient with videos

[RichardDawkins]

http://www.scissorboy.com/video/index/122/-1/all/40
http://scissorboylive.com/category/h...on-techniques/

Open for discussions. But what i say is, clinics should get in touch with Gho for Clarification reasons

[BoSox]

I'm curious to see his results, also the cost for these procedures.

[kundun]

prices on www.hasci.com
prices only valid for treatment in The Netherlands.
If you want treatment in London prices are different.

[NoName72]

One question, what provokes the hair loss is the fact that the "mother" stem cells don't leave the place to the new one wich stop the hair cycle and makes you bald right ? So why are these stem cells different from the one on the top of our heads ? Does that mean this treatment work but only if you get injection everytime your hair falls ? And can we get multiple injections until we get a head full of hairs ?

[RichardDawkins]

What injection?

[NoName72]

Well they inject the stem cells no ?

[NeedHairASAP]

http://www.scissorboy.com/video/index/122/-1/all/40
http://scissorboylive.com/category/h...on-techniques/

Open for discussions. But what i say is, clinics should get in touch with Gho for Clarification reasons

can anybody find recent pictures/video of him? his blog hasn't mentioned the hair transplant since march 29th or something....

[NeedHairASAP]

how can I be the only one interested in these results..... or gho in general



bioregenerative sciences isn't going to do shit

trx9 is a joke... just another thing that gets people wishing and hoping and saying, " ya its definitely making my hair thicker but not sure about regrowth"... sorry guys but I think it may be time to throw the trx towel in and put some effort into figuring out whats up with gho

[HairTalk]

Perhaps I'm being dense, but I don't see how this procedure is so very different from F.U.E. What prevents loss in the donor area? Even on Gho's Web site, it's stated there's "little," not "no," loss in the region.

It seems to me, the idea is simply to perform F.U.E., except to do so using smaller-than-usual (i.e., .5mm, rather than maybe .7mm) incisions. Calling the excisions "stem cells" rather than "follicular units" certainly makes things sound appealing and new, but could someone (knowledgable) please explain to me how what is being done truly is different from what Dr. Woods began trying before the 21st century?

Altogether, this seems simply like an attempt to perform in-vivo hair multiplication using transection with F.U.E. I'm not suggesting it's a terrible idea that must be abandoned, but that it isn't the novel, ground-breaking concept as which it's being marketed. I believe Dr. Bernstein is trying out the method, as well; I'd rather wait to hear his results than pin any hopes to Gho and what I feel is his sensationalism and gimmickry.

[NeedHairASAP]

well.... let the HST frenzy begin




http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=2133218843886