-
Originally Posted by RichardDawkins
I am open for everything if it has nothing to do with stop spanking the monkey :-)
Ahhhhh!!! That's it!!! The mice were not masturbating thats why it worked so well!!!
-
there was a mouse where? there on the stairs there on the stairs right now,a little mouse with clogs on well i declare going cccclop on the stairs with a full head of hair hahaha
-
Uk you solved the puzzle. Stop the presses and stop research.
Uk please can you start a thread a new one with those incredible findings? Thanks in advance
-
Originally Posted by UK_
Minox might contain elements of nitric oxide but this article is CLAIMING their compound grew new hair follicles - now either there is something we are missing regarding their formula or this trial was a load of bullshit.
place your bets!
-
I call it benefit of doubt with shift towards bullshit
-
I just hope they come out with some sort of explanation of how the hell they were able to grow new follicles - I mean we here all know what a daunting task that would be....
...I'd be relieved if they said their compound had some sort of mixture with other growth factors etc that targeted the wnt pathway... if that's the case then this gel may have applications for grey hair aswel.
-
If the product is in phase 2 human trials, then there must have a phase 1 human trial that demonstrated some level of safety and efficacy. I understand everyone's cynicism, since we've been down this road so many times before, but AFAIK Nitric Oxide isn't being marketed specifically as a hair loss treatment. I see room for cautious optimism here. The fact that there is a clinical trial puts this one ahead of TRX2, Bioregenerative Sciences, and all the other crap treatments that are out there.
I am very curious about the follicle genesis part, since we know minoxidil doesn't do that.
-
I guess we will just have to wait until April - I am still shocked that they managed to use something as widely used as NOS to grow new hair follicles in mice and rats.
April is 10 months away, I guess time will fly between now and then.
-
10 months away ? That can also mean a lot of hair lost. God damn, why is it always in the future when it comes to hair loss treatments?
-
Senior Member
10 months mean nothing dude. It will probably take much longer and maybe not work at all...most likely not work at all.
meh
Similar Threads
-
By Hairlicious in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 5
Last Post: 01-19-2011, 10:54 AM
-
By j14nelson in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 8
Last Post: 11-10-2010, 11:18 AM
-
By teg_101 in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
Replies: 12
Last Post: 06-06-2010, 02:51 PM
-
By Mr. 4000 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 1
Last Post: 08-05-2009, 05:49 PM
-
By tbtadmin in forum BaldTruthTalk Videos
Replies: 0
Last Post: 03-24-2009, 12:55 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks