+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    253

    Default Why the Interest in TRX2?

    There's a thread about TRX2 in this forum that spans thousands of replies. I wonder, why? Is it just good marketing? Are people genuinely piqued by the possible efficacy of this product? What's the deal?

    I finally checked out the product's Web site, and it seems the pills contain (http://www.trx2.com/store/wp-content...2_november.jpg),

    191mg potassium chloride (a simple salt compound)
    150mcg biotin (vitamin B7)
    800mg carnitine (a biologically important protein)
    150mg leucine (just an essential amino acid)
    75mg isoleucine (another essential amino acid)
    75mg valine (yet another essential amino acid)
    40mg nicotinic acid (vitamin B3)

    Of course, you can break down any compound to its elemental constituents, then say, "that's not so special," but none of these substances has any clinically-proved direct effect on treating hairloss. Sure, if you're starving, so not getting enough nutrients, hairloss might be a side-effect (then, a supplement/pill that gives you some of what you're deprived of could help you grow back some), but that isn't "male pattern baldness." Of the seven ingredients listed by the manufacturer, you'll take in all the amino acids and vitamins in your diet (if you have a healthy one); that's five components.

    Then, it comes to about $70.00/bottle — that is, a month's supply — for some carnitine and KCl, neither of which has been linked to re-growth of hair or even to impeding androgenic alopecia.

    So, why all the interest?

  2. #2
    Senior Member BoSox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    703

    Default

    Why the interest? Well at first it was just another hair loss treatment with some "promise" for results. People are desperate, I think if TRX2 works it will be good until hair cloning is ready.

    Besides there are people who are seeing good results 3 months in. Chances are after another 3 or so more months they will ( hopefully ) do even better.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    316

    Default

    I don't get it either. I think maybe at the beginning people saw that Thomas Whitfield had legitimate credentials, and were hopeful that someone with a legitimate scientific reputation wouldn't be part of a scam. Now that the product has been on the market for months and Whitfield has yet to publish a single photograph, or any sort of objective data to support his claims, I think it is becoming obvious that this is just another scam. Even the testimonials on the TRX2 website are completely underwhelming. All you see are a bunch of comments along the lines of "Gee this seems to have stopped my hair fall (almost)...um I think." Pathetic.

    If you follow the TRX2 thread, I don't any of the trialists are having good results. Only one person claims to have had any significant improvement, but based on the lack of coherence in that person's posts, I suspect he may be on more than just hair loss pills, and he has no credibility as far as I'm concerned.

    I hope now that TRX2 doesn't seem to be working out, everyone can shift their focus and energy to other treatments that actually show some promise.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thinning@30 View Post
    I don't get it either. I think maybe at the beginning people saw that Thomas Whitfield had legitimate credentials, and were hopeful that someone with a legitimate scientific reputation wouldn't be part of a scam. Now that the product has been on the market for months and Whitfield has yet to publish a single photograph, or any sort of objective data to support his claims, I think it is becoming obvious that this is just another scam. Even the testimonials on the TRX2 website are completely underwhelming. All you see are a bunch of comments along the lines of "Gee this seems to have stopped my hair fall (almost)...um I think." Pathetic.

    If you follow the TRX2 thread, I don't any of the trialists are having good results. Only one person claims to have had any significant improvement, but based on the lack of coherence in that person's posts, I suspect he may be on more than just hair loss pills, and he has no credibility as far as I'm concerned.

    I hope now that TRX2 doesn't seem to be working out, everyone can shift their focus and energy to other treatments that actually show some promise.
    i agree,has anyone figured by the time everyone has realized this is bullshit,he will be rich?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    254

    Default

    Ok I'll be devil's advocate.
    TRX2 has claimed pics and results are to be released Q3 2011. Until then let's just wait

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    253

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flowers View Post
    Ok I'll be devil's advocate.
    TRX2 has claimed pics and results are to be released Q3 2011. Until then let's just wait
    Let's not. The product, by the third quarter of 2011, will have been on the market for ~one year, right? That's a lot of money. Let's go ahead and be concerned or annoyed, now.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    461

    Default

    I don't really think he's selling that much product. Honestly. If he was he'd be spending on an advertising budget of some sort

    Apart from that, I'm sticking with this till month 9. Waiting and seeing since I have no other option right now.

    I don't recommend buying it until anything is proven, until you're desperate like me and willing to gamble.

    If by month 6 I have seen no results or indication of coming results, rest assured that I'll be leading the charge to Whitfield's gates.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    253

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AgainstThis View Post
    I don't really think he's selling that much product. Honestly. If he was he'd be spending on an advertising budget of some sort

    Apart from that, I'm sticking with this till month 9. Waiting and seeing since I have no other option right now.

    I don't recommend buying it until anything is proven, until you're desperate like me and willing to gamble.

    If by month 6 I have seen no results or indication of coming results, rest assured that I'll be leading the charge to Whitfield's gates.
    If you're already in it, then I do wish you the best.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flowers View Post
    Ok I'll be devil's advocate.
    TRX2 has claimed pics and results are to be released Q3 2011. Until then let's just wait
    Ha ha !! What a load of BS ! So this SOB conman wants us to buy his product first, then he will show us the proof -after 1 year- that his shit works ! This product and the so-called inventor have "scam" written all over them.

    All he's trying to do is make as much money as he can within the first year then close doors and run -because eventually the truth will come out and people will stop buying his garbage. This is a classic con operation.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    316

    Default

    Ha ha !! What a load of BS ! So this SOB conman wants us to buy his product first, then he will show us the proof -after 1 year- that his shit works ! This product and the so-called inventor have "scam" written all over them.

    All he's trying to do is make as much money as he can within the first year then close doors and run -because eventually the truth will come out and people will stop buying his garbage. This is a classic con operation.
    I think this is exactly what is going on with TRX2. Whitfield, who apparently has a PhD from Oxford, must know what is and what is not good science. If he has a PhD, then he is well-versed in concepts such as statistical significance and what constitutes objective scientific data vs subjective anecdotes. The TRX2 website is full of specious nonsense without the slightest bit of evidence that the product works. Where are the hair counts? Where are the double-blind, placebo-controlled studies? Why is Whitfield asking customers to send in their photos? Did it not occur to him to document TRX2's own "trial" with photographs and objective measures? The whole thing is just so maddening.

Similar Threads

  1. Trx2?
    By BoSox in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 4643
    Last Post: 01-11-2018, 10:14 PM
  2. Re trx2
    By doke in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-14-2011, 04:14 PM
  3. Trx2 v Renokin
    By thejdizzle in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-26-2011, 03:50 AM
  4. Who's going to try TRX2?
    By Anonymousman in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-08-2011, 10:53 AM
  5. Trx2
    By Balding Celebrities in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-18-2010, 01:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

My FUE Into FUT Scar Result Revealed After 5 Years
Yesterday 10:10 AM
Last Post By JoeTillman
Yesterday 10:10 AM
2 operations with Asmed, Dr. Erdogan - 2007 and 2016
10-06-2020 10:53 AM
Last Post By sicore8826
04-12-2024 02:41 PM
How do you make a truck sound like a train horn?
09-13-2023 09:58 PM
by Bial
Last Post By frasheron
04-12-2024 06:02 AM
Dr. Glenn Charles FUT
04-10-2024 07:36 AM
Last Post By Dr. Glenn Charles
04-10-2024 07:36 AM