-
Originally Posted by Davey Jones
Yeah, I'd say the best case scenario (among things that are actually possible) is that they did really, really well and are frantically making sure they are able to protect their intellectual properties before the announcement.
If the history of hair loss cures is any indication of anything, then that is probably not what is going on. But keep in mind people, maybe it won't be tomorrow, but one of these days, that is what's going to be happening.
Good man, regardless of what happens, we won't be in limbo anymore. There will be a definitive answer, cure or no cure I'll be happy to just have some sort of substance.
-
Heeeeeeeeeeeeeellllllpppppp
i dont want to be bald anymore!!!!!!
-
Even if the results from this one solitary injection designed primarily to measure safety are good (meaning safe, and at least SOME indication of new terminal hair) there will be people here whinging and bitching.
I can just imagine it now. "Only 3 hairs per sq cm? Total failure. **** Replicel. I told you guys all along it would never work. David Hall should be in jail."
I don't even want to imagine this place if it's safe but with no indication of new terminal hair. In fact I think I will be quitting this forum.
-
Originally Posted by Pate
Even if the results from this one solitary injection designed primarily to measure safety are good (meaning safe, and at least SOME indication of new terminal hair) there will be people here whinging and bitching.
I can just imagine it now. "Only 3 hairs per sq cm? Total failure. **** Replicel. I told you guys all along it would never work. David Hall should be in jail."
I don't even want to imagine this place if it's safe but with no indication of new terminal hair. In fact I think I will be quitting this forum.
I agree, there is no pleasing some people. I think some are expecting a cure for baldness in a few days. Replicel are still in the very early stages and this won't happen so I'm also dreading the Replicel hate posts that will be flooding this thread in a few days time.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by WillhasWill
Replicel are still in the very early stages and this won't happen so I'm also dreading the Replicel hate posts that will be flooding this thread in a few days time.
True, but if Replicel comes out with a homerun, the next 2-5 years will be stress free. Cure for stress followed by cure to baldness.
-
Originally Posted by BoSox
True, but if Replicel comes out with a homerun, the next 2-5 years will be stress free. Cure for stress followed by cure to baldness.
If you can afford it.
Histogen have a better chance then replicel tbh.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by yeahyeahyeah
If you can afford it.
Histogen have a better chance then replicel tbh.
Anybody making even half way decent money should be able to save $20,000 in five years. Depends what you want more: cappuccinos everyday or hair?
-
Originally Posted by BoSox
True, but if Replicel comes out with a homerun, the next 2-5 years will be stress free. Cure for stress followed by cure to baldness.
Yeh dude, stress is a bitch. I've been away from discussions for a while and honestly feels pretty good to not check the forums for updates every morning, but couldn't stay away cos of replicel... guess we just gotta stayed positive.
Personally I rather be optimistic and be let down from time to time, it's gotta be better than staying in a perpetually dark place where all glasses are half empty.
-
Originally Posted by uninformed
Yeh dude, stress is a bitch. I've been away from discussions for a while and honestly feels pretty good to not check the forums for updates every morning, but couldn't stay away cos of replicel... guess we just gotta stayed positive.
Personally I rather be optimistic and be let down from time to time, it's gotta be better than staying in a perpetually dark place where all glasses are half empty.
Yeah, it corrodes you. After the replicel update I'm outta here for a while.
Only reason why I am sticking around.
-
This may not be the time to say this, but it's a concern I had with the science from the beginning. I'm certainly no expert in this field but when I saw the explanation of procedure I was rather sceptical.
I only mention this as I have not seen it suggested yet, but the way I see it is there are 2 factors that would make or break this theory.
The first and most important one is whether these cells activate something within the hair follicle. I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that it does do something otherwise they'd be rather daft going to this length if it didn't.
For me however there is something that has never added up. Why would the cells magnate to hair follicles once injected into a scalp? It just seems very convenient to suggest they would. I hope them the best, and wish suffers of hairloss some relief, but it just doesn't add up for me.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks