Replicel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NAS
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 4

    Great Hairline HT doctors will still be needed when Replicel starts the treatment. Especially king of hairlines Dr. Rahal because it would be so hard to design a hairline with the injections they have. If Replicel works then definitely HT surgeons will lose some of the business but for sure they will be needed for hairlines, atleast the first inch. FUE will then replace Strip for good.

    Comment

    • clandestine
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 2005

      Originally posted by NAS
      Great Hairline HT doctors will still be needed when Replicel starts the treatment. Especially king of hairlines Dr. Rahal because it would be so hard to design a hairline with the injections they have. If Replicel works then definitely HT surgeons will lose some of the business but for sure they will be needed for hairlines, atleast the first inch. FUE will then replace Strip for good.
      ****ing strip. So barbaric. Let's literally take a strip of skin out of the back of this guy's head, then harvest the hair from it. Bollocks.

      Comment

      • DepressedByHairLoss
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 876

        Originally posted by clandestine
        ****ing strip. So barbaric. Let's literally take a strip of skin out of the back of this guy's head, then harvest the hair from it. Bollocks.
        I couldn't agree with you more, clandestine. And the fact that doctors still consider strip hair transplantation the gold standard of hair restoration is just downright sad, and really goes to show that we need much better options to fight hair loss. It's no wonder that the statistics show that less than 10% of people suffering from hair loss seek treatment, and even less opt for hair transplantation. One of the main issues that I have with hair transplantation is the permanent head scarring. Although people will say that the scarring is covered up the native hair, "a scar is still a scar" and that scar will be with a person for the rest of their life. I was talking to my friend late last night (waiting to sober up so I could drive home, haha) for almost 3 hours and a lot of what we talked about was how people change and how things that are important to a person now, may not be important to a person 5 or 10 years from now. He was a long-haired rocker when he was my age, but as he grew older, he couldn't care less about having a bouffant of hair and fitting in with the rock n roll lifestyle. So that made me think that maybe there will be a day when I will just be content shaving my long hair, looking like a big bad-ass (I've always been a big guy), and will not worry about constantly taking Propecia (which is causing me side effects). But if I ever got a hair transplant, those thoughts would be ruined since I would need to worry about covering up a scar on the back of my head for the rest of my life. Poor Clandestine, you posted one simple and accurate comment, and I respond by "talking your ear off" with my long-winded dissertation! Haha....
        One last thing, I was actually at the club last night and I saw a couple of guys sitting at a table not far from me. They had shaved heads yet they still had girlfriends and looked very good. One of them actually looked like one of my favorite UFC fighters so I actually went up to him and said "dude, I'm not gay or anything and I love women (haha) but would you mind if I took a photo of you with my cell phone since you look just like one of my favorite UFC fighters". Haha, he and his friends got a good laugh out of it and I took the pic. So I texted that photo to my friends with the caption "the clone of Shane Carwin". But I had another reason for taking that photo. I thought to myself: here is a normal guy (not famous like Jason Statham) with a shaved head who still is in the company of an attractive women and is very confident about himself. That photo will serve as a reminder to me that if there comes a time where I actually do shave my head, I will know that I can still get women and still be confident, just like this guy was last night.
        Wow, did I get off on a tangent or what!!

        Comment

        • DepressedByHairLoss
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2011
          • 876

          Originally posted by NAS
          Great Hairline HT doctors will still be needed when Replicel starts the treatment. Especially king of hairlines Dr. Rahal because it would be so hard to design a hairline with the injections they have. If Replicel works then definitely HT surgeons will lose some of the business but for sure they will be needed for hairlines, atleast the first inch. FUE will then replace Strip for good.
          Actually, I'm not even so sure that hairline HT doctors would be needed at all. If Replicel's technology does what it's supposed to do, then it will not only create new follicles, but revive dormant ones as well. So the follicles that are dormant where our old hair lines used to be will simply be revived; the hair follicles that used to be there will start producing hair once again. So hopefully the follicles that used to comprise our old hairlines will be woken up and will start producing hair again.

          Comment

          • NotBelievingIt
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2011
            • 595

            All speculation until we see the delivery mechanism.

            That 'perfect' hairline will still be sought though, so I'm sure HT's will be around for awhile.

            Plus HT's will decrease in cost also.

            Comment

            • NotDyingBald
              Member
              • Jun 2011
              • 48

              Just found this with all the information about Replicel. Some of it i´ve never seen discussed here before.

              Comment

              • 2020
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2012
                • 1527

                very interesting paper!

                Revenue is generated in two streams:
                1. Assumed annual license fee of $20,000 to each RepliCel licensed clinician performing the procedure.
                2. Per-patient fee of $15,000 for the replication of each patient’s cells.
                does that mean that Replicel's procedure will cost > $15K?


                also:

                By the year 2018, it is estimated that there will be 48 practitioners
                performing the procedure equating to over $580 million in patient fees alone and approximately $1
                million per year in licensing fees.
                if the procedure was released in 2015, would it really take them THREE years to push this into the market?



                and lastly:


                This report may be a paid advertisement and is neither an offer nor recommendation to buy or sell any security

                Comment

                • elvispresley
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 115

                  Originally posted by 2020
                  very interesting paper!



                  does that mean that Replicel's procedure will cost > $15K?


                  also:



                  if the procedure was released in 2015, would it really take them THREE years to push this into the market?



                  and lastly:





                  my opinion is:

                  that if works will come out for 2015-16. they say by 2018 will be tot. doctorswho practice...

                  the key point as always is that freaking IF WORKING. lol

                  Comment

                  • john2399
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 527

                    David hall even said by 2015 it will be on market.

                    Comment

                    • Mojo Risin
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 157

                      Originally posted by john2399
                      David hall even said by 2015 it will be on market.
                      Cotsarelis said in 2007 that in 5 years, there was gonna be a cure.

                      Don't be stupid.

                      Comment

                      • ccmethinning
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 326

                        Originally posted by john2399
                        David hall even said by 2015 it will be on market.
                        No he didn't. He said the BEST CASE SCENARIO is late 2016.

                        Comment

                        • elvispresley
                          Senior Member
                          • Jun 2011
                          • 115

                          anyway no one trust cotsarella anymore.
                          so maybe is on the good way to find the cure. but probably will be too late if replicel and others will work!

                          plus gho , that is doing well ... so just let him research , we dont care about him until he show a cure that is realizable in short time and not in 1 million years like everytime.

                          bye cotsy! lol

                          Comment

                          • NeedHairASAP
                            Senior Member
                            • Jul 2011
                            • 1410

                            Originally posted by cleverusername
                            They said late April so probably at the end of the month.

                            I bet they push it back

                            Comment

                            • Bronson
                              Member
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 35

                              Whoa, what the hell? According to that research document's revenue chart, they claim replicel will only be available to a few dozen practitioners for the first few YEARS that it's released and they will only be able to treat people in the low thousands....what the f@$k!? There's millions of people who would want this, why would they offer it to so few people and how will they determine who gets it? If it's $15,000 per treatment that still involves millions of people who are willing to pay that. Am I missing something here? Damn it

                              So here's a question for the CEO of Replicel: when your product is released in 2015/16, will it be available to everyone who can afford it?
                              Last edited by Bronson; 04-02-2012, 02:20 AM. Reason: wanted to add a question.

                              Comment

                              • kaandereli
                                Member
                                • Jan 2012
                                • 57

                                if replicel achieves more or less an achievement, say 15% , they should sell it immediately so that the we would not count everyday so desperately till 2015 or later on.
                                otherwise we would have nothing in our hands for 3-4 years, which is very frustrating and consuming.
                                it is also the case for aderans and histogen.they just said "we had 62% growth in 6 months and whatever" and then disappeared from the scene
                                they should give us a good reason to wait until that "bleak date" of their eventual success.

                                Comment

                                Working...