Replicel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 534623
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 1865

    Originally posted by gmonasco
    Eh? When has Replicel ever said that?
    TrichoScience is developing a non-surgical hair restoration procedure based on the clinical replication of hair root cells and their re-introduction into areas of hair loss. The patent-pending, in-clinic procedure will allow a patient to obtain an unlimited amount of hair reproduced from their own hair cells. Included in


    fact sheet-and on their website, videos.

    Comment

    • 2020
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 1527

      The anticipated long term result is the restoration of a full head of
      hair that has been seeded by the patient’s own natural hair cells.
      great


      this is interesting:

      In addition, hair transplantation surgery inflicts
      considerable scalp tissue damage
      , while our procedure generates virtually no tissue damage.

      Comment

      • VictimOfDHT
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 748

        Originally posted by 534623
        http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpos...87&postcount=1

        fact sheet-and on their website, videos.
        Wishful thinking...so far. But I'm waiting for that day- not so patiently.

        Comment

        • Maradona
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2011
          • 830

          Originally posted by VictimOfDHT
          It's going to be beyond depressing if they don't give us any good news this time -which is what I expect. I'll probably be more devastated than any of you here with me losing my transplanted hair. Not that I have too much hope but I'm desperate for something after finding out -in my case- that "the only permanent solution" to hair loss is not permanent at all.
          That factsheet tell us nothing . Apparently they are keeping all the details secret I hope. The key point here is the DSC cells if they are not different than DP cells, then we are royally screwed.

          The paper they published(what they based their study on), doesn't prove much difference. DP cells were able to grow on a mouse footpad and ears too 100% of the time like DSC cells.

          For some reason, however, DSC cells grow hair nicely and in the right direction(ARI, also managed to grow hair in the right direction, but using DP) It's the only difference, which points out that it may in fact be the key , hence was born Replicel.

          We will see some results guys, this is obvious, that's why I invested in the stock. Wether this will be cosmetically significant or not, I hope we can find out in phase 1. Most important is phase 2, hopefully they can run clinical trials like aderans with multiple protocols, which they may no need at all depending on phase 1.

          it really sucks we only have one scientific paper from replicel, maybe because that's the only thing they needed to patent , they are keeping the rest top secret i suppose.

          Comment

          • gmonasco
            Inactive
            • Apr 2010
            • 883

            Originally posted by 534623
            fact sheet-and on their website, videos.
            Uh, no. That's just the ideal goal (for Replicel and everyone else who's working on hair loss treatments); it's not something Replicel said they "can" do.

            Comment

            • Supersixx
              Member
              • Mar 2012
              • 49

              Originally posted by 534623
              don't worry-they say they can give you a full head of hair.
              ROGAINE advertises that everyday....hair transplant co say it all time, but IT'S NOT TRUE...its pure PR just like this thread......this site......and fake breaking news.....every last one of em are snake oil.........say I'm negative or whatever but I was trained as a child to be 'surprised rather than disappointed'. This way my hopes aren't high at all. My expectations may be but my hopes are not. Until I see a Norwood 456 go to a Norwood 0 , u can't tell me nothing .(Kanye west voice).

              Comment

              • 534623
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2011
                • 1865

                Originally posted by Supersixx
                say I'm negative or whatever
                you're negative or whatever.

                Comment

                • Supersixx
                  Member
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 49

                  Originally posted by 534623
                  you're negative or whatever.
                  Lol....had me in tears!

                  Comment

                  • 2020
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 1527

                    Originally posted by Supersixx
                    ROGAINE advertises that everyday....hair transplant co say it all time, but IT'S NOT TRUE...its pure PR just like this thread......this site......and fake breaking news.....every last one of em are snake oil.........say I'm negative or whatever but I was trained as a child to be 'surprised rather than disappointed'. This way my hopes aren't high at all. My expectations may be but my hopes are not. Until I see a Norwood 456 go to a Norwood 0 , u can't tell me nothing .(Kanye west voice).
                    you idiot.... Replicel is snake oil??? Do you even know how their treatment works??? Keep injecting those cells until you get whatever result you want.... There is virtually no limit

                    Comment

                    • Maradona
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2011
                      • 830

                      Originally posted by Supersixx
                      ROGAINE advertises that everyday....hair transplant co say it all time, but IT'S NOT TRUE...its pure PR just like this thread......this site......and fake breaking news.....every last one of em are snake oil.........say I'm negative or whatever but I was trained as a child to be 'surprised rather than disappointed'. This way my hopes aren't high at all. My expectations may be but my hopes are not. Until I see a Norwood 456 go to a Norwood 0 , u can't tell me nothing .(Kanye west voice).
                      you were trained wrong then. It is likely you will never see a norwood 7 to norwood 0 transformation in your lifetime because the tissue needed for hair regeneration or new "follicle formation" may already be destroyed.

                      Replicel will most likely become an effective treatment, not a complete cure. I hope i eat my words but I doubt it .

                      Comment

                      • clandestine
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 2005

                        Originally posted by Maradona
                        you were trained wrong then. It is likely you will never see a norwood 7 to norwood 0 transformation in your lifetime because the tissue needed for hair regeneration or new "follicle formation" may already be destroyed.

                        Replicel will most likely become an effective treatment, not a complete cure. I hope i eat my words but I doubt it .
                        The first step towards an effective cure, perhaps.

                        Comment

                        • krewel
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2011
                          • 188

                          Originally posted by Maradona
                          you were trained wrong then. It is likely you will never see a norwood 7 to norwood 0 transformation in your lifetime because the tissue needed for hair regeneration or new "follicle formation" may already be destroyed.
                          Not true, hair follicles do not die unless they get damaged by mechanical force. Miniaturization is not a linear life to death process. It gets slower until it reaches its apparent end, which is in a biological sense not death but a form of sleep.
                          Logically hair follicles at this stage of miniaturization are less responsive which makes the process of reversion way more time-consuming.

                          Comment

                          • 534623
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2011
                            • 1865

                            Originally posted by krewel
                            Not true, hair follicles do not die unless they get damaged by mechanical force. Miniaturization is not a linear life to death process. It gets slower until it reaches its apparent end, which is in a biological sense not death but a form of sleep.
                            Logically hair follicles at this stage of miniaturization are less responsive which makes the process of reversion way more time-consuming.
                            not true. or do you think cadavers are -in a biblical sense- just a form of sleep?

                            Comment

                            • Davey Jones
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2012
                              • 356

                              Originally posted by krewel
                              Not true, hair follicles do not die unless they get damaged by mechanical force.
                              Originally posted by 534623
                              not true. or do you think cadavers are -in a biblical sense- just a form of sleep?
                              [Citations needed.]

                              Comment

                              • 534623
                                Senior Member
                                • Oct 2011
                                • 1865

                                Originally posted by Davey Jones
                                [Citations needed.]

                                death=death

                                Comment

                                Working...