-
12-29-2012 04:06 PM
#1941
Wow. Just checked their stock price. Down to .47 cents. Glad I got outta this POS. This company is dying fast.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=repcf&ql=1
-
12-29-2012 06:30 PM
#1942
Senior Member
bump 10 charrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
-
01-14-2013 05:49 PM
#1943
2013/14 big years
I think that when replicel gets this efficacy trial in the books, Mr. ccmethinning will be reaching for the un-send button on his December 29th assertion. Dont think they expected to do much with 20 people and uber-dosing of subjects, except of course to show that if that burrage of cells causes no ill effects, then nothing will. Good luck to 'em, I say.
-
01-15-2013 04:41 PM
#1944
Originally Posted by ccmethinning
You're making a classic mistake of assuming a price decline or increase is related to a companies health.
While generally that is true -- it applies moreso to established companies that actually have products on the market. Product-In-Development baby BioTech companies should rarely be viewed the same.
-
01-15-2013 05:30 PM
#1945
have they released full phase 1 results? i only know of the 6 month update...
-
01-15-2013 05:55 PM
#1946
Im a positive fellow, but sorry...Repicel are a fail. If all they can do is up the cell dose, it wont work.
We are not mice. Stuff that works on mice wont work on us. This has been proven over and over again.
But at least theyre carrying on, you never know. If they could offer 20% regrowth for $2000 and prove that regrown hairs wont start thinning again...could be a winner.
-
01-15-2013 06:13 PM
#1947
Replicel is Broke
The problem with Replicel is they had only $959,174 in cash as of September, and now it's January so I look for someone else to acquire the IP after they go broke.
-
01-15-2013 06:21 PM
#1948
Originally Posted by neversaynever
Im a positive fellow, but sorry...Repicel are a fail. If all they can do is up the cell dose, it wont work.
We are not mice. Stuff that works on mice wont work on us. This has been proven over and over again.
But at least theyre carrying on, you never know. If they could offer 20% regrowth for $2000 and prove that regrown hairs wont start thinning again...could be a winner.
I used to agree but I'm actually coming around to the "immunisation from DHT" theory. Given what we know about fibrosis.
We also need to wait and see if the vellus hairs they grew go terminal by 24 months. 20% increase in terminal hair count actually starts to look vaguely interesting, especially if compoundable and permanent.
Replicel need to seriously pick their game up, but I'm not writing them off completely yet. Maybe just 70% written off. :-)
-
01-15-2013 06:31 PM
#1949
Originally Posted by Pate
I used to agree but I'm actually coming around to the "immunisation from DHT" theory. Given what we know about fibrosis.
We also need to wait and see if the vellus hairs they grew go terminal by 24 months. 20% increase in terminal hair count actually starts to look vaguely interesting, especially if compoundable and permanent.
Replicel need to seriously pick their game up, but I'm not writing them off completely yet. Maybe just 70% written off. :-)
If aderans and replicel announced their results are permanant, they just cured guys who are starting to bald. Im not sure if thatll happen, given the body can signal to create more follicles.
I would love to know what steps (if any) adereans and replicel have taken to check that theory. They extract from the safe zone for that very reason, I wonder how they check it....
-
01-15-2013 10:17 PM
#1950
Originally Posted by neversaynever
If aderans and replicel announced their results are permanant, they just cured guys who are starting to bald. Im not sure if thatll happen, given the body can signal to create more follicles.
I would love to know what steps (if any) adereans and replicel have taken to check that theory. They extract from the safe zone for that very reason, I wonder how they check it....
Really there is only one way to check it. Photographs and time!
They could probably biopsy the treated area and study it to confirm the follicles aren't susceptible to DHT, but realistically only in vivo studies will confirm it. And that means following guys who have had the treatment over years.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks