+ Reply to Thread
Page 186 of 210 FirstFirst ... 86 136 176 184 185 186 187 188 196 ... LastLast
Results 1,851 to 1,860 of 2095

Thread: Replicel

  1. #1851
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    218

    Default

    When it comes to reading threads and posts in the 'future treaments' section on this (and other hairloss forum) websites, i start to suffer from a very serious case of déjà vu.

    I wouldn't even consider myself as a hairloss forum veteran, or even well educated in hairloss in the slightest, or even a daily user of hairloss sites, but cripes it can get ridiculous, with the sheer volume of 'new' and 'old' and 'advanced' treatments flooding the market in the cure for baldness ...i feel dizzy!

    Hairloss cure? 10 years to go from today, or 10 years to go in 10 years from today??

  2. #1852
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    218

    Default

    ...we're all seeing and saying the same things over and over and over again.

    Don't knock me for saying what i'm saying (before you do) as that's overly predictable aswell!!

  3. #1853
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,744

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 67mph View Post
    ...we're all seeing and saying the same things over and over and over again.

    Don't knock me for saying what i'm saying (before you do) as that's overly predictable aswell!!
    There hasnt been a time in history where so many regenerative approaches to treating hair loss have been in actual human clinical trials, they are making progress.

  4. #1854
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,744

    Default

    The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.

  5. #1855
    Member Horseshoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UK_ View Post
    The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.
    I hope your right. The stock has been down about 66% since the six month results. So if anyone really believes they are the real deal then they should buy it at the current discount. As for me, I already bought it at the over inflated price of $2.60 and sitting on a big loss. I have not sold or bought anymore, just waiting with my fingers crossed and hoping for a cure.

  6. #1856
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UK_ View Post
    The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.
    I really wonder what results would look like from a combination of replicel and aderans or histogen..... hmmm.

  7. #1857
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    57

    Default

    i wonder when will replicel publish 12 months results.they should have already collected the data in july

  8. #1858
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    263

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UK_ View Post
    The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.
    They should be coming up on their 12 month time point, pretty soon. I thought it would be around October. Hopefully they'll update ....be curious to see if they achieved more terminal hair growth.

  9. #1859
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,744

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Alchemist View Post
    They should be coming up on their 12 month time point, pretty soon. I thought it would be around October. Hopefully they'll update ....be curious to see if they achieved more terminal hair growth.
    I believe you're correct, I just want to hear when they plan to start their Phase 2 trial.

  10. #1860
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Replicel is doing a presentation and update September 11th at 2:25 PM ET in the Starlight South suite at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York. We actually get a webcast this time.


    http://www.replicel.com/replicel-to-...nt-conference/

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

purchase requisition in business central
12-19-2023 05:38 AM
Last Post By David9232
Today 11:39 AM
Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Today 10:12 AM
An inconvenient truth about FUE
Today 07:24 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
Today 07:24 AM
Surgeons in SE Asia (Thailand)
10-20-2018 10:30 AM
by martino
Last Post By EFab
04-17-2024 08:34 AM