-
06-12-2012 06:05 PM
#1681
Senior Member
Originally Posted by NotBelievingIt
Directly creating a new follicile that is immune or "immunizing" existing will directly lead to normal growth cycles. It won't have to "build up to" anything. It will just be.
if that is even happening(brand new follicles)....
-
06-13-2012 04:15 AM
#1682
I guess we'll see. Although I'm not hoping too much....
-
06-16-2012 10:04 AM
#1683
Replicel are prepping for phase ll trials which is, as far as i gather, entirely in regards to dosage.
The outcome of this little number, may turn out to be a miracle maker!
-
06-16-2012 10:25 AM
#1684
Originally Posted by 67mph
Replicel are prepping for phase ll trials which is, as far as i gather, entirely in regards to dosage.
The outcome of this little number, may turn out to be a miracle maker!
Yeah, and this study should be ONLY relevant one! Let's hope for the best... or maybe to find out another hair health function.
-
06-16-2012 10:53 AM
#1685
...and sorry, when i said phase ll, i of course meant phase llb!
-
06-16-2012 10:20 PM
#1686
http://www.stemcelltreatment.me/biol...r-hair-growth/
"Molecular imaging will speed up the development of stem cell therapies for hair loss".
IMO... throw magic at this shit it'll always be "5 years away".
-
06-25-2012 04:55 AM
#1687
http://www.replicel.com/replicel-pro...inical-trials/
In one month, the subjects of this first trial should complete 12 months after the first injection. We should try to get some information about the results.
-
07-01-2012 06:04 PM
#1688
In one month, the subjects of this first trial should complete 12 months after the first injection. We should try to get some information about the results.
I agree. After the disappointment following Replicel's publication of its first trial results, it seems like a lot of the energy and enthusiasm behind Replicel's approach died down. I've been wondering though if any of the trial participants experienced continued improvement and possibly more significant results at the 9-month or 12-month mark.
-
07-01-2012 06:07 PM
#1689
Originally Posted by Thinning@30
I agree. After the disappointment following Replicel's publication of its first trial results, it seems like a lot of the energy and enthusiasm behind Replicel's approach died down. I've been wondering though if any of the trial participants experienced continued improvement and possibly more significant results at the 9-month or 12-month mark.
IMHO, they're done.
Even if it comes to market it wont be effective on us, CEO clearly said it won't work on everyone.
-
07-01-2012 06:15 PM
#1690
^ Completely unsubstantiated
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks