Replicel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thinning87
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 847

    What is the difference between Replicel and Histogen technology?

    Comment

    • 534623
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 1865

      Originally posted by Thinning87

      What is the difference between Replicel and Histogen technology?
      You mean after seeing the before/after pics clarence posted?

      From an analytical point of view - none. Both cook with hot water.

      Comment

      • Thinning87
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2012
        • 847

        Originally posted by 534623
        You mean after seeing the before/after pics clarence posted?

        From an analytical point of view - none. Both cook with hot water.
        You have no credibility here - go away

        Comment

        • clarence
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2012
          • 278

          Pimp my placebo

          Well even I admit there is alot of hair growth in that picture on the right. Almost as much as in the "before" picture. And I hear they are getting ready to publish more results, once they actually find the area, where the reported 19,2 % grew.

          I mean, it's not like these people have been entirely without success. In one controlled evaluation, regrowth was noted especially from guys in the placebo group. The next trial will concentrate on upping the placebo dosage, or so I hear...

          Remember folks, these are only results from phase 1, which they are running to look for possible side effects, such as hair growth!

          Recent paparazzi footage may be suggesting that the young prince William has been one of the first actual clients of Replicel. Indeed, the thinness of his mane suggest he has ditched Toppik in favor of Replicel. And so, Replicel remain convinced that their treatment will be more effective than those of their competitors; so, apparently they are testing it for something besides hair.

          Comment

          • kaandereli
            Member
            • Jan 2012
            • 57

            guys, 19% is obtained from only one injection, whereas histogen made multiple injections in phase 2a.

            Replicel , like histogen , will apply multiple doses in their phase 2b trial,

            so we will discover if replicel is also effective as histogen, or maybe supreior to it

            Comment

            • 67mph
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2010
              • 218

              Originally posted by clarence
              Well even I admit there is alot of hair growth in that picture on the right. Almost as much as in the "before" picture. And I hear they are getting ready to publish more results, once they actually find the area, where the reported 19,2 % grew.

              I mean, it's not like these people have been entirely without success. In one controlled evaluation, regrowth was noted especially from guys in the placebo group. The next trial will concentrate on upping the placebo dosage, or so I hear...

              Remember folks, these are only results from phase 1, which they are running to look for possible side effects, such as hair growth!

              Recent paparazzi footage may be suggesting that the young prince William has been one of the first actual clients of Replicel. Indeed, the thinness of his mane suggest he has ditched Toppik in favor of Replicel. And so, Replicel remain convinced that their treatment will be more effective than those of their competitors; so, apparently they are testing it for something besides hair.
              Upping the placebo? Do you know what a placebo is?
              ...and where you getting you Prince info?!

              C'mon Replicel, c'mon!!

              Comment

              • Desmond84
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2012
                • 987

                Replicel definitely has the potential to work and give us 20% regrowth, but now that they've fallen behind even more, this pushes their release date even further; somewhere around Q3 2018- Q1 2019...

                I can't stop thinking wether that's too late for most of us! I think we should really focus on Aderans for the next few months, since if they really do go into Phase 3 we may REALLY have this available by the end of 2015!

                Comment

                • Thinning87
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2012
                  • 847

                  So wasn't there an upcoming update on the 25th or something like that? What happened?

                  Comment

                  • The Alchemist
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 265

                    Originally posted by Thinning87
                    So wasn't there an upcoming update on the 25th or something like that? What happened?
                    Yeah, they were attempting to convince some biotech investors that their results were really much better than they appeared. It was at some biopartnering conference. Hopefully they didn't get laughed out of the room.

                    Comment

                    • hellouser
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2012
                      • 4423

                      Originally posted by The Alchemist
                      Yeah, they were attempting to convince some biotech investors that their results were really much better than they appeared. It was at some biopartnering conference. Hopefully they didn't get laughed out of the room.
                      Guaranteed they showed the investors data that wasnt shown to us.

                      Comment

                      • The Alchemist
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 265

                        Originally posted by hellouser
                        Guaranteed they showed the investors data that wasnt shown to us.
                        I hope so - because if they don't have something good, and with aderans only working marginally well for 4 out of 10 guys, we're running out of options in a hurry.

                        I think Histogen might be the only realistic shot we have at a good treatment in the near future. But, they've still have to report out on their trial before we know anything about what it can do.

                        Comment

                        • UK Boy
                          Senior Member
                          • Apr 2011
                          • 244

                          No women

                          Replicel seem to have dropped women from their trials, phase II shows that they're only planning to recruite male test subjects. Wonder why they dropped women? Thought these type of treatments usually worked better on them lol.

                          Comment

                          • MackJames
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 165

                            Originally posted by UK Boy
                            Replicel seem to have dropped women from their trials, phase II shows that they're only planning to recruite male test subjects. Wonder why they dropped women? Thought these type of treatments usually worked better on them lol.

                            I wonder if they were the poorest responders.

                            Comment

                            • hellouser
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2012
                              • 4423

                              Originally posted by MackJames
                              I wonder if they were the poorest responders.
                              If women were suffering from baldness in the same numbers as men, we would have had a cure 50 years ago.

                              Society doesnt give a shit about mens health.

                              Comment

                              • MackJames
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2009
                                • 165

                                Originally posted by hellouser
                                If women were suffering from baldness in the same numbers as men, we would have had a cure 50 years ago.

                                Society doesnt give a shit about mens health.


                                Maybe. I'm just curious about the reason behind removing women from the next trial. There has to be a rationale for it. The only thing I can think of is women aren't responding as well and sinking the overall results.

                                Comment

                                Working...