Replicel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ccmethinning
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 326

    LOL Rodman and Renshaw. Most dishonest stock pumpers in the business. Whenever Rodman and Renshaw is involved, stay far, far away.

    Comment

    • Kiwi
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 1105

      Originally posted by Knockin on NW4
      Replicel is doing a presentation and update September 11th at 2:25 PM ET in the Starlight South suite at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York. We actually get a webcast this time.


      http://www.replicel.com/replicel-to-...nt-conference/
      I would have been vaguely interested if it was a Histogen or Aderans presentation...

      Whats the bet its the same marketing speil bull crap on the interview with Spencer. They can't tell us anything meaningful for whatever legal reasons...

      ... so if that is the case please **** off replicel and don't come back until you can tell us if the treatment does or doesnt provide cosmetic improvements!

      Comment

      • UK_
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2011
        • 2744

        Originally posted by Knockin on NW4
        Replicel is doing a presentation and update September 11th at 2:25 PM ET in the Starlight South suite at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York. We actually get a webcast this time.


        http://www.replicel.com/replicel-to-...nt-conference/
        Thanks for this info - I didnt check their page lol.

        So looks like they're gearing up for their phase II - I remember back before their phase I they had one of these presentations and got started with the recruitment and screening process fairly quickly after.

        Comment

        • UK_
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2011
          • 2744

          Originally posted by Kiwi
          I would have been vaguely interested if it was a Histogen or Aderans presentation...

          Whats the bet its the same marketing speil bull crap on the interview with Spencer. They can't tell us anything meaningful for whatever legal reasons...

          ... so if that is the case please **** off replicel and don't come back until you can tell us if the treatment does or doesnt provide cosmetic improvements!
          Take it easy, Replicel deserve our thanks at the very least compared the millions of other companies who cant be bothered to look into new and effective therapeutic treatments and choose to instead churn out garbage expensive cosmetic products aimed at acidic upper-middle class women.

          Lets compare the number of health treatments/companies developing/targeting products at men compared to women, perhaps we can then establish truly the lie of a polarized sexual oppression throughout our society. Lol@"female oppression" - makes me laugh everytime, all you need to do is take a trip to a shopping mall to see what a nonsensical manipulative load of horse manure this yet unproven allegation is.

          Comment

          • Alf
            Member
            • Jul 2012
            • 92

            Originally posted by UK_
            Take it easy, Replicel deserve our thanks at the very least compared the millions of other companies who cant be bothered to look into new and effective therapeutic treatments and choose to instead churn out garbage expensive cosmetic products aimed at acidic upper-middle class women.

            Lets compare the number of health treatments/companies developing/targeting products at men compared to women, perhaps we can then establish truly the lie of a polarized sexual oppression throughout our society. Lol@"female oppression" - makes me laugh everytime, all you need to do is take a trip to a shopping mall to see what a nonsensical manipulative load of horse manure this yet unproven allegation is.
            Yes, but we want a cure for hair loss, not some mumbojumbo from cosmetic company, and that is what women buy.

            Alf who actually sent mail to his local medical school and asked if they could do balding research.

            Comment

            • UK_
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2011
              • 2744

              Originally posted by Alf
              Yes, but we want a cure for hair loss, not some mumbojumbo from cosmetic company, and that is what women buy.

              Alf who actually sent mail to his local medical school and asked if they could do balding research.
              Women will be oppressed no matter what - take away the whole FEM-DOM consumption machine and you're oppressing women, introduce it and you're objectifying them (another form of oppression) - feminism is the disease here - no matter what steps you take, feminism will never have its thirst sated, only until it gains what it initially set out to do - which is to eliminate all forms of mammalian prevalence on this planet shall it be contented with its sadistic, manipulative, racist, radical & selfish actions.

              The greatest website ever:

              http://www.manwomanmyth.com/

              Comment

              • Kiwi
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 1105

                Originally posted by UK_
                Women will be oppressed no matter what - take away the whole FEM-DOM consumption machine and you're oppressing women, introduce it and you're objectifying them (another form of oppression) - feminism is the disease here - no matter what steps you take, feminism will never have its thirst sated, only until it gains what it initially set out to do - which is to eliminate all forms of mammalian prevalence on this planet shall it be contented with its sadistic, manipulative, racist, radical & selfish actions.

                The greatest website ever:

                http://www.manwomanmyth.com/
                LOL - thats the funniest thing I've read all day... okay here's a good joke for you.

                Woman constantly carry on about how they can fake an orgasm for the sake of the relationship, but we all know that the real heroes are us men that can fake a relationship for the sake on an orgasm.

                Tracey - Please don't hate me!!!!

                Comment

                • The Alchemist
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 265

                  Originally posted by Knockin on NW4
                  Replicel is doing a presentation and update September 11th at 2:25 PM ET in the Starlight South suite at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York. We actually get a webcast this time.


                  http://www.replicel.com/replicel-to-...nt-conference/

                  Listened to the presentation, nothing new there. Maybe a few details about their dosing protocol for phase II. However, what i found disappointing was that they don't intend to update with the 12 month results from phase I. I could've swore they had an interval timepoint of 6 and 12 months...but i guess not. We won't hear anything about that study until the 24 month timepoint.

                  Comment

                  • Kiwi
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 1105

                    Originally posted by The Alchemist
                    Listened to the presentation, nothing new there. Maybe a few details about their dosing protocol for phase II. However, what i found disappointing was that they don't intend to update with the 12 month results from phase I. I could've swore they had an interval timepoint of 6 and 12 months...but i guess not. We won't hear anything about that study until the 24 month timepoint.
                    Seriously... did somebody think that there would be something new?

                    Comment

                    • The Alchemist
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 265

                      Originally posted by Kiwi
                      Seriously... did somebody think that there would be something new?
                      Yeah, there was something new...we won't hear squat about phase 1 from them until the 24 month time point.

                      Comment

                      • rdawg
                        Senior Member
                        • Jun 2012
                        • 1019

                        Originally posted by The Alchemist
                        Yeah, there was something new...we won't hear squat about phase 1 from them until the 24 month time point.
                        all that tells me is the results they wanted have not happened and are back at the drawing board.

                        Replicel still has promise to it, it's just a bit behind at this point and who knows when they'll get the right formula.

                        Comment

                        • bananana
                          Inactive
                          • Feb 2012
                          • 525

                          How come they didnt even recognize histogen as a competitor?
                          Only aderans...

                          Comment

                          • Kiwi
                            Senior Member
                            • Mar 2011
                            • 1105

                            Originally posted by bananana
                            How come they didnt even recognize histogen as a competitor?
                            Only aderans...
                            It does not matter why. And unless you're a mind reader with god like omnipresence we'll never know.

                            Personally I could not careless.

                            Comment

                            • bananana
                              Inactive
                              • Feb 2012
                              • 525

                              Originally posted by Kiwi
                              It does not matter why. And unless you're a mind reader with god like omnipresence we'll never know.

                              Personally I could not careless.
                              Agreed with you. I was just curious... Well, we'll have to wait at least a year to see some new results. The thing I'm most "worried" about is they already injected millions of cells and good poor results (lets be honest - if they have some new great results - we would have known by now), now they'll be lowering the dose and hoping for better ones. Hm...

                              Comment

                              • UK_
                                Senior Member
                                • Feb 2011
                                • 2744

                                Originally posted by bananana
                                Agreed with you. I was just curious... Well, we'll have to wait at least a year to see some new results. The thing I'm most "worried" about is they already injected millions of cells and good poor results (lets be honest - if they have some new great results - we would have known by now), now they'll be lowering the dose and hoping for better ones. Hm...
                                Ive been thinking about this for a while too - why would a lesser dose result in greater efficacy? Well I realised that with cell therapy that is actually often the case! There is often a 'dose range' that the researchers have discovered was successful in animal models prior - a dose range that was more effective than significantly higher doses.

                                Now the very fact that Replicel increased their dose significantly helped their cause more than anything, because they proved safety, which dramatically reduces the time of clinical trials.

                                I dont think efficacy can be found through injecting huge amounts of cells, I believe smaller doses say 3 - 4 times a year will give you the results of 60 - 70% regrowth.

                                Comment

                                Working...