Replicel
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Tb4
Found this: anyone know why nothing came of this?
"RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. is developing TB4 for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds and for the treatment of a variety of human diseases involving tissue and organ repair under an exclusive world-wide license from the NIH. The Company holds several patents related to the technology and has numerous patent applications pending. The Company also holds a separate, exclusive world-wide license related to TB4 and its use for hair regeneration and treatment of alopecia (loss of hair). The Company has successfully completed Phase I human clinical trials with TB4 for the treatment of chronic dermal wounds and expects to begin Phase II trials in the first half of 2004".Comment
-
I remember this lol - the gene therapy that would cure baldness in 5 years time... 9 years ago!
As far as I know they tested this on mice but not on humans, I think they concentrated on using the compound to regenerate heart function, which is a tad more important than hair loss lol.
Anyone else have any ideas why this didnt cure us?Comment
-
When it comes to reading threads and posts in the 'future treaments' section on this (and other hairloss forum) websites, i start to suffer from a very serious case of déjà vu.
I wouldn't even consider myself as a hairloss forum veteran, or even well educated in hairloss in the slightest, or even a daily user of hairloss sites, but cripes it can get ridiculous, with the sheer volume of 'new' and 'old' and 'advanced' treatments flooding the market in the cure for baldness ...i feel dizzy!
Hairloss cure? 10 years to go from today, or 10 years to go in 10 years from today??Comment
-
There hasnt been a time in history where so many regenerative approaches to treating hair loss have been in actual human clinical trials, they are making progress.Comment
-
The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.Comment
-
The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.Comment
-
The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.Comment
-
i wonder when will replicel publish 12 months results.they should have already collected the data in julyComment
-
The fact remains that people call Replicel a failure but it was only ONE treatment and a single 6 month follow-up, if the treatment was applied 3 - 4 times over the period of a year you'd probably get much better results, which is why Replicel are taking phase 1 results as a positive, they KNOW they can improve the results.Comment
-
I believe you're correct, I just want to hear when they plan to start their Phase 2 trial.Comment
-
Replicel is doing a presentation and update September 11th at 2:25 PM ET in the Starlight South suite at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York. We actually get a webcast this time.
Comment
Comment