Histogen Update - Spencer Kobren Speaks With Dr. Craig L. Ziering

[abb83]

I sent an email to Dr. Gail Naughton around 3 weeks ago, asking if the trials were in progress and up to date. I made it clear that I was not expecting any results at this point and just wanted to know if they started trials. I'm not sure what to make of her reply but at least it seems Histogen is still alive ha.

Hi, CVAZBAR
Good to hear from you.
As I write this my clinical director and I are on our way to Alaska for the International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery annual meeting where our two year follow up hair study and some new applications of our product will be presented by both Dr. Craig Ziering and Dr. Neil Sadick. Our IND is under review in Asia and we are finalizing our regulatory strategy for North America. We will send out a formal statement shortly and remain excited by the level of interest in HSC from both clinicians and patients.
Please stay in touch.
Take care,
Gail

Shall we really believe you that she replied to you? the presidents of the company? she's not busy at all? she would say hi CVAZBAR, instead of your name as in Hi Joel... or if thats your name you think she would say it all in caps?

[Sogeking]

Shall we really believe you that she replied to you? the presidents of the company? she's not busy at all? she would say hi CVAZBAR, instead of your name as in Hi Joel... or if thats your name you think she would say it all in caps?

You are reaching.

CVAZBAR just put his nickname instead of his real name. When you send an email from an email adress that goes like this: name.surname@yahoo.com. Then I think you can see how she knows his name. Now it is possible that this mail was written by her secretary or someone else and made to look like its from her. We can't tell.

But I really don't think that CVAZBAR or anyone for that matter would make up an email that doesn't divulge anything impotant. What possible gain does he have from this?

[abb83]

You are reaching.

CVAZBAR just put his nickname instead of his real name. When you send an email from an email adress that goes like this: name.surname@yahoo.com. Then I think you can see how she knows his name. Now it is possible that this mail was written by her secretary or someone else and made to look like its from her. We can't tell.

But I really don't think that CVAZBAR or anyone for that matter would make up an email that doesn't divulge anything impotant. What possible gain does he have from this?

then i am sorry :s there's a lot of people full of bs. i regret my previous post if thats the case. i actually emailed her a long time ago and never got back.

[CVAZBAR]

Sogeking is 100% right. I used my nickname posting it here but she replied to me by my name. Yes, maybe it was her secretary as I cannot prove otherwise. I also understand if nobody wants to believe it. All I can say is that I don't bullshit and have no reason to do it. It's up to you guys whether you want to believe or not.

[abb83]

Sogeking is 100% right. I used my nickname posting it here but she replied to me by my name. Yes, maybe it was her secretary as I cannot prove otherwise. I also understand if nobody wants to believe it. All I can say is that I don't bullshit and have no reason to do it. It's up to you guys whether you want to believe or not.

nah thx for sharing mate

[Dasani]

So I'm guessing everyone is just tired of posting speculation and we're all just waiting for data from all the different clinical trials to come in Q1 2012?? haha

[clandestine]

Pretty well, yes, After 122 pages there is only so much you can speculate before some real trial data comes in.

[CVAZBAR]

Spencer said he will post info soon on Histogen, Acell etc from the meetings in Alaska.

[NeedHairASAP]

Spencer said he will post info soon on Histogen, Acell etc from the meetings in Alaska.

I'm going to assume that Histogen's results were good. otherwise rassman would have already blogged about it being a failure... him omitting any mention of it is, sadly, a sign that it went well.

[CVAZBAR]

I'm going to assume that Histogen's results were good. otherwise rassman would have already blogged about it being a failure... him omitting any mention of it is, sadly, a sign that it went well.

Let's hope it is. I'm guessing it won't be anything special, maybe just an update from the pre-trials.

[Kiwi]

Let's hope it is. I'm guessing it won't be anything special, maybe just an update from the pre-trials.

I don't know why you don't think that is special!!!

As long as they don't report back failure we're still in the green.

[Sogeking]

I'm going to assume that Histogen's results were good. otherwise rassman would have already blogged about it being a failure... him omitting any mention of it is, sadly, a sign that it went well.

Why sadly? I don't understand, a person would think you would be cheering for this to work .

[uninformed]

Why sadly? I don't understand, a person would think you would be cheering for this to work .

I think he's saying that it is sad that Dr rassman would discourage advancements like histogen and acell (hence not reviewing anything related to the next gen treatments such as histogen, aderans and replicel from alaska), but promote rubbish "treatments" like tattooing your head

[NeedHairASAP]

I think he's saying that it is sad that Dr rassman would discourage advancements like histogen and acell (hence not reviewing anything related to the next gen treatments such as histogen, aderans and replicel from alaska), but promote rubbish "treatments" like tattooing your head

this is correct


cant wait for spencer's alaska update

[Ronin]

When's the update going to happen? Do we know?