-
10-08-2011 10:01 AM
#3521
Originally Posted by AgainstThis
What Ted notes is the most interesting. If all test subjects had JUST begun losing their hair (And how is that measured exactly? A NW1 breaking to 2? Not even THAT maybe? So actually people with zero visible loss?) how are any gains measured?
And yes, whilst it would make sense that if this alters your metabolism and BLAH BLAH it would take that much time to accomplish I seriously doubt it. No pictures is the biggest problem here.
Still. Between Replicel and Toppik, I get a tiny bit optimistic here people
Well in the CUSTOMER TESTIMONIALS the test persons are NW 2 and 4 so I dont know what to believe
-
10-08-2011 10:32 AM
#3522
Originally Posted by AgainstThis
Suspiciously lacking any and all pictures and basically telling me that by now I should have seen a 35% increase in my hair and that if I keep at it for another 9 months, it will be a whopping 50% increase.
I just don't see it. Really. Maybe it'll happen but I just can't be that optimistic.
PS My Toppik arrives on Monday. Will let you know how viable it may be till I get the full 50% back. Mwaha
So the "results" are out but they don't show any pics or real proof! Yeah, I can do that too. I can come up with some snake oil and make my own "study" and "results" and tell the world it works. These mother ****ers are some die-hard scammers. I can't believe people still talk about this Trx crap.
Let us know how the Toppik works. I'm thinking about giving it a try.
-
10-08-2011 12:53 PM
#3523
Originally Posted by Ted
Yea, it would have been nice with some pictures. Still Im pleased with the numbers. Now we hopefully have something to look forward to =).
One thing that strikes me though is this:
Duration of hair loss (months)
TRX2™
5.3 ± 3.1
Placebo
4.7 ± 2.3
Why did they choose people who just had begun losing hair?
This must be a spelling mistake. In the beginning it says "Alopecia must have been present for at least 6 months...". I guess they means years not month. I have dropped them a line.
-
10-08-2011 01:12 PM
#3524
Originally Posted by VictimOfDHT
So the "results" are out but they don't show any pics or real proof! Yeah, I can do that too. I can come up with some snake oil and make my own "study" and "results" and tell the world it works. These mother ****ers are some die-hard scammers. I can't believe people still talk about this Trx crap.
Let us know how the Toppik works. I'm thinking about giving it a try.
Thus we should all stop posting in this thread..
-
10-08-2011 08:55 PM
#3525
i discovered a new product and named it TRX3,
Clinical studies results below:
6 month = 50% increase in hair
12 months = 80% increase in hair.
Buy out now limited stock available.
-
10-09-2011 02:03 AM
#3526
I still do not know why you guys are talking about trx as the ingredience has been around many years and as said before you can make the vit supplement up yourselves for a lot less money.
Its time to move on to something else it may help as a vit with other topicals but not at the cost it is.
-
10-09-2011 02:05 AM
#3527
Originally Posted by ALLISWELL
i discovered a new product and named it TRX3,
Clinical studies results below:
6 month = 50% increase in hair
12 months = 80% increase in hair.
Buy out now limited stock available.
50% AND 80% OF HOW MANY PEOPLE?
-
10-09-2011 02:18 AM
#3528
-
10-09-2011 02:54 AM
#3529
I have checked out the astressin b peptide and it seems it has only gave results in mice? well a lot of treatments said to help with pattern loss seem to be tested on mice,so if we use the spectral f7 its just a trial we do know that latisse is being tested on humans and also stem cell treatments are at this time.
It is frustrating that some treatments may help keep what you have there needs to be a treatment that regrows hair and that is the hard part,and when it comes which i think it will how much will it cost and the company will make millions.
But if that does happen other hair loss scams will be out of the window,the stemcell baldness site have a company that has found that mpb patients can regrow hair again on cue baldness its a case of finding the stem cells to turn the follicules back on again.
-
10-09-2011 11:52 AM
#3530
Also, they report a 50% increase in hair regrowth after a year and a half.
This means that areas who now appear thin, will be completely covered. Without pictures, I call TOTAL bullshit. The only future TRX2 has as is, is if they cut the price to around 20 Euros per bottle. Then it can compete with the rest of the harmless vitamins.
Similar Threads
-
By joe from staten island in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
Replies: 2
Last Post: 11-15-2010, 12:32 PM
-
By Balding Celebrities in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 1
Last Post: 10-18-2010, 01:47 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks