+ Reply to Thread
Page 353 of 465 FirstFirst ... 253 303 343 351 352 353 354 355 363 403 453 ... LastLast
Results 3,521 to 3,530 of 4644

Thread: Trx2?

  1. #3521
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AgainstThis View Post
    What Ted notes is the most interesting. If all test subjects had JUST begun losing their hair (And how is that measured exactly? A NW1 breaking to 2? Not even THAT maybe? So actually people with zero visible loss?) how are any gains measured?

    And yes, whilst it would make sense that if this alters your metabolism and BLAH BLAH it would take that much time to accomplish I seriously doubt it. No pictures is the biggest problem here.

    Still. Between Replicel and Toppik, I get a tiny bit optimistic here people
    Well in the CUSTOMER TESTIMONIALS the test persons are NW 2 and 4 so I dont know what to believe

  2. #3522
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AgainstThis View Post
    Suspiciously lacking any and all pictures and basically telling me that by now I should have seen a 35% increase in my hair and that if I keep at it for another 9 months, it will be a whopping 50% increase.

    I just don't see it. Really. Maybe it'll happen but I just can't be that optimistic.

    PS My Toppik arrives on Monday. Will let you know how viable it may be till I get the full 50% back. Mwaha

    So the "results" are out but they don't show any pics or real proof! Yeah, I can do that too. I can come up with some snake oil and make my own "study" and "results" and tell the world it works. These mother ****ers are some die-hard scammers. I can't believe people still talk about this Trx crap.

    Let us know how the Toppik works. I'm thinking about giving it a try.

  3. #3523
    Inactive
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ted View Post
    Yea, it would have been nice with some pictures. Still Im pleased with the numbers. Now we hopefully have something to look forward to =).

    One thing that strikes me though is this:

    Duration of hair loss (months)
    TRX2™
    5.3 ± 3.1
    Placebo
    4.7 ± 2.3

    Why did they choose people who just had begun losing hair?
    This must be a spelling mistake. In the beginning it says "Alopecia must have been present for at least 6 months...". I guess they means years not month. I have dropped them a line.

  4. #3524
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,004

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VictimOfDHT View Post
    So the "results" are out but they don't show any pics or real proof! Yeah, I can do that too. I can come up with some snake oil and make my own "study" and "results" and tell the world it works. These mother ****ers are some die-hard scammers. I can't believe people still talk about this Trx crap.

    Let us know how the Toppik works. I'm thinking about giving it a try.
    Thus we should all stop posting in this thread..

  5. #3525
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    52

    Default

    i discovered a new product and named it TRX3,

    Clinical studies results below:

    6 month = 50% increase in hair
    12 months = 80% increase in hair.

    Buy out now limited stock available.

  6. #3526
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,474

    Default

    I still do not know why you guys are talking about trx as the ingredience has been around many years and as said before you can make the vit supplement up yourselves for a lot less money.
    Its time to move on to something else it may help as a vit with other topicals but not at the cost it is.

  7. #3527
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,474

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ALLISWELL View Post
    i discovered a new product and named it TRX3,

    Clinical studies results below:

    6 month = 50% increase in hair
    12 months = 80% increase in hair.

    Buy out now limited stock available.
    50% AND 80% OF HOW MANY PEOPLE?

  8. #3528
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,474

    Default

    Hi guys just checked it out it seems that there were 29-30 people and that the results are not that good compaired to minoxidil trials as they used 2000 people and the results were very high thats why it came on to the market with the high drug safty tests that incures.
    So as said its a thing that can be used alongside as jcm is doing but due to its cost i will not be buying anymore if it was a lot more lower cost i might have.
    When we think of beginning male pattern and the advanced stage there still is not one single thing that will regrow hair on totally cue baldness and something that you can use and see tremendous results only a hair transplant that has come a long way nowadays.
    Will spectrals new topicals do it i somehow doubt it,its all about making money,stem cell treatments well maybe i am on one of these at the moment but i still think the balls out on this one,i will know in about another two months if its going to help.

  9. #3529
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,474

    Lightbulb

    I have checked out the astressin b peptide and it seems it has only gave results in mice? well a lot of treatments said to help with pattern loss seem to be tested on mice,so if we use the spectral f7 its just a trial we do know that latisse is being tested on humans and also stem cell treatments are at this time.
    It is frustrating that some treatments may help keep what you have there needs to be a treatment that regrows hair and that is the hard part,and when it comes which i think it will how much will it cost and the company will make millions.
    But if that does happen other hair loss scams will be out of the window,the stemcell baldness site have a company that has found that mpb patients can regrow hair again on cue baldness its a case of finding the stem cells to turn the follicules back on again.

  10. #3530
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    461

    Default

    Also, they report a 50% increase in hair regrowth after a year and a half.

    This means that areas who now appear thin, will be completely covered. Without pictures, I call TOTAL bullshit. The only future TRX2 has as is, is if they cut the price to around 20 Euros per bottle. Then it can compete with the rest of the harmless vitamins.

Similar Threads

  1. thomas whitfield trx2 hair loss treatment
    By joe from staten island in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 12:32 PM
  2. Trx2
    By Balding Celebrities in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-18-2010, 01:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

teeth bleaching near me
11-21-2023 07:05 AM
Last Post By KenyaFuentes
Today 01:34 PM
The Mane Event for Thursday, June 15th, 2023
06-15-2023 02:59 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Today 02:15 AM
Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By SarahCarter
04-22-2024 04:24 PM
Scar Grafting with Dr Cole
06-21-2012 02:00 PM
Last Post By northeastguy
04-22-2024 10:14 AM
Misinformation Online - The Bald Truth, Friday April 19th, 2024
04-19-2024 02:36 PM
Last Post By JoeTillman
04-19-2024 02:36 PM