Trx2? - Page 352 - BaldTruthTalk.com
+ Reply to Thread
Page 352 of 465 FirstFirst ... 252 302 342 350 351 352 353 354 362 402 452 ... LastLast
Results 3,511 to 3,520 of 4644

Thread: Trx2?

  1. #3511
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,623

    Default

    Far as I recall data should have been posted around the end of September? That's what Andy said to me ages ago.

  2. #3512
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,473

    Default

    The divine skin nanoxidil 5% supposed to be above minoxidil for results? i wonder if it is as always a bit sceptical,i did contact ds and they said to use with the f7 so that would be a bit expensive.
    We all would not mind if it helped but as always until we try it nothing is proved.

  3. #3513
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    64

    Default

    Results are up:
    http://www .trx2.com/store/clinical-study-results/

  4. #3514
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    461

    Default

    Suspiciously lacking any and all pictures and basically telling me that by now I should have seen a 35% increase in my hair and that if I keep at it for another 9 months, it will be a whopping 50% increase.

    I just don't see it. Really. Maybe it'll happen but I just can't be that optimistic.

    PS My Toppik arrives on Monday. Will let you know how viable it may be till I get the full 50% back. Mwaha

  5. #3515
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by doke View Post
    The divine skin nanoxidil 5% supposed to be above minoxidil for results? i wonder if it is as always a bit sceptical,i did contact ds and they said to use with the f7 so that would be a bit expensive.
    We all would not mind if it helped but as always until we try it nothing is proved.
    Iím planning to try F7 first, then if thatís not giving results try DNC-N and finally combine them if need be but that would be expensive.

  6. #3516
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    156

    Default

    Yea, it would have been nice with some pictures. Still Im pleased with the numbers. Now we hopefully have something to look forward to =).

    One thing that strikes me though is this:

    Duration of hair loss (months)
    TRX2ô
    5.3 Ī 3.1
    Placebo
    4.7 Ī 2.3

    Why did they choose people who just had begun losing hair?

  7. #3517
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,623

    Default

    I must be on the vegetable capsules-bullshit baffles brains and off they go again. Who were these trial people? Where's pictorial evidence? Oh and let's all fund them for twelve months now? They keep dangling that carrot..

  8. #3518
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,398

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ted View Post
    Yea, it would have been nice with some pictures. Still Im pleased with the numbers. Now we hopefully have something to look forward to =).

    One thing that strikes me though is this:

    Duration of hair loss (months)
    TRX2ô
    5.3 Ī 3.1
    Placebo
    4.7 Ī 2.3

    Why did they choose people who just had begun losing hair?
    I think the idea is that the people in the early stages of hair loss will (re)gain significant regrowth, hence why they were picked.

  9. #3519
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    461

    Default

    What Ted notes is the most interesting. If all test subjects had JUST begun losing their hair (And how is that measured exactly? A NW1 breaking to 2? Not even THAT maybe? So actually people with zero visible loss?) how are any gains measured?

    And yes, whilst it would make sense that if this alters your metabolism and BLAH BLAH it would take that much time to accomplish I seriously doubt it. No pictures is the biggest problem here.

    Still. Between Replicel and Toppik, I get a tiny bit optimistic here people

  10. #3520
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,623

    Default

    Yep, I'm the negative poster here but I'm not convinced by these results in the slightest. I'm quitting at eight months but will however continue taking individual compounds for the hell of it and because it's cheaper.

    Interesting to see how long termers get on with it tho-good luck, keen for you guys to report temporal hair re-growth!

Similar Threads

  1. thomas whitfield trx2 hair loss treatment
    By joe from staten island in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 12:32 PM
  2. Trx2
    By Balding Celebrities in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-18-2010, 01:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

11.06.20 Koray Erdogan 5000 Greft Results
04-18-2022 08:41 AM
by 110620
Last Post By firstchoicemeds
Today 12:31 AM
How can I promote my own business?
08-31-2022 01:29 PM
Last Post By MariannaMay
Yesterday 09:36 AM
Creating a Forum Signature
12-27-2021 11:08 AM
09-23-2022 10:48 PM
DR HAKAN DOGANAY/ 4300 GRAFTS / Implanter Pen+FUE
09-23-2022 03:40 PM
Last Post By Hakan Doganay, MD
09-23-2022 03:40 PM
New hair care regime based on gene / anti-ageing science
02-22-2022 10:45 AM
Last Post By japhine
09-21-2022 10:20 PM