+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 163

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryan555 View Post
    I am an investor in Histogen. The plan is still to release the HSC in Asia (excluding Japan) in 2013, and in the US and Europe by 2015. They are conducting their next trial phase in Singapore in February. I am assuming that if this product does everything it is supposed to do, most of you will figure out a way to get to Asia.
    If Phase II is successful why cant histogen skip phase III and offer the injections at full price in black markets such as Mexico, India, or in International Waters if necessary?

    I dont care how much it costs, time is not on my side.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    54

    Default

    i note that there are some unanswered questions that I think Dr Hitzig and Dr Cooley alluded to particularly about hair cycling and androgen sensitivity. I am a little baffled as to why they dont already know the anwsers to these.

    Dr Hitzig did have some success with plucking in the past. This process is no different except Acell is used to increase effectiveness. So there are already plucked hair (pre 2005) patients walking amongst us. Of course they might not know if plucked head hair never worked.

    do the hairs cycle and good quality?
    any dr hitzig pre2005 plucked hair (not beard) patient care to answer this question ? although the additon of acell has the potential to improve quality.

    are plucked hairs androgen sensitive ?
    not sure about this, is there a test to check androgen sensitivity of the new follicle. otherwise any pre2005 Dr Hitzig plucking patients that had plucked scalp hair success out there still have this non miniturised hair growing, even if only a few took hold ?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    444

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rapunzal View Post
    i note that there are some unanswered questions that I think Dr Hitzig and Dr Cooley alluded to particularly about hair cycling and androgen sensitivity. I am a little baffled as to why they dont already know the anwsers to these.

    Dr Hitzig did have some success with plucking in the past. This process is no different except Acell is used to increase effectiveness. So there are already plucked hair (pre 2005) patients walking amongst us. Of course they might not know if plucked head hair never worked.

    do the hairs cycle and good quality?
    any dr hitzig pre2005 plucked hair (not beard) patient care to answer this question ? although the additon of acell has the potential to improve quality.

    are plucked hairs androgen sensitive ?
    not sure about this, is there a test to check androgen sensitivity of the new follicle. otherwise any pre2005 Dr Hitzig plucking patients that had plucked scalp hair success out there still have this non miniturised hair growing, even if only a few took hold ?
    I think i remember hearing that the process on plucking hairs now with Acell is different because it needed to be plucked with the epithelial tissue included, which is different from the past. As for the sensitive androgen, it would also take time since this this type of plucking is different. You can read more and look for yourself in other threads because im not sure exactly what's the difference.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    54

    Default

    possibly, perhaps Dr H could clarify but I presume that its the same concept as Dr H used sometime back however they might have improved the technique. I mean, the hair shaft would be useless without the cells attached, i would think the same would have applied back in the early days.

    on another note i notice that a few people believe this would be an adjunct to existing hair transplant methods. this has be baffled, i mean why would this not become the "gold standard" and only method IF it is successful.

    what does traditional STRIP and FUE offer that this potentially couldn't ?
    only one thing comes to mind and that is an entire FU in its natural state and even then, Dr C in one of his presentations showed that he placed multiple hairs in a single slot to mimic a natural FU so apart from this ... nothing

  5. #5
    Inactive
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    74

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rapunzal View Post
    possibly, perhaps Dr H could clarify but I presume that its the same concept as Dr H used sometime back however they might have improved the technique. I mean, the hair shaft would be useless without the cells attached, i would think the same would have applied back in the early days.

    on another note i notice that a few people believe this would be an adjunct to existing hair transplant methods. this has be baffled, i mean why would this not become the "gold standard" and only method IF it is successful.

    what does traditional STRIP and FUE offer that this potentially couldn't ?
    only one thing comes to mind and that is an entire FU in its natural state and even then, Dr C in one of his presentations showed that he placed multiple hairs in a single slot to mimic a natural FU so apart from this ... nothing
    I think the question is (in general), does it make sense (besides the necessary effort) to do so in the daily clinical praxis? How about plucking of the natural hair groupings all at once?

    http://www.hasci.com/uploads/downloa...%20Neumann.pdf

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    54

    Default

    hhmm very interesting approach, FUE with transection, theoretically sounds good but would need improved extraction tools and highly skilled Doctor to maintain accuracy and increase the number of hair extraction per minute. I wonder how many grafts Dr Woods extracted per minute when he started FUE.

Similar Threads

  1. 2,853 grafts by Dr Jerry Cooley - North Carolina
    By Jerry Cooley, MD in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-30-2009, 04:59 PM
  2. Hair Transplant IAHRS Member Dr. Jerry Cooley
    By tbtadmin in forum BaldTruthTalk Videos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-22-2009, 12:27 PM
  3. Jerry Cooley, MD | 4600 Grafts | 2 Sessions
    By Jerry Cooley, MD in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-04-2009, 02:43 PM
  4. Dr. Jerry Cooley | 3,377 Grafts | 46 Years Old
    By Jerry Cooley, MD in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-21-2009, 03:49 PM
  5. Jerry Cooley, MD | 6,617 FU Grafts| 59 Year Old Man | 2 Sessions
    By Jerry Cooley, MD in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-12-2008, 05:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth