Just a straw poll study I thought I'd run out of idle curiousity. Does the bald gene get worse with every generation and are we going bald at a progressively younger age?
Both my grandfathers began losing hair in their 50s but it was rapid and one was a Norwood V before he died, the other is now a Norwood VII (possibly now with DUPA - but he didn't begin losing hair until his late 50s).
Only one of my great grandparents ever lost their hair, in their 30s, and became a Norwood VII.
My father and his brother both began to lose hair in their early 20s, about age 24 for my dad I think. This occurred very slowly he was still Norwood 3a at 40. He's now a Norwood V going on VI, his brother is a VI.
I began losing hair, presumably, at 19 and it became noticeable at 20 (I really didn't notice until it was starkly obvious). At 27, I'm a Norwood 4 with thinning progressing to Norwood 4, the worst case of baldness I think my family has ever seen.
I can't help thinking then that the genetic defect gets worse every generation (hence my thread don't have children - I don't want a bald 15 year old son!)
Both my grandfathers began losing hair in their 50s but it was rapid and one was a Norwood V before he died, the other is now a Norwood VII (possibly now with DUPA - but he didn't begin losing hair until his late 50s).
Only one of my great grandparents ever lost their hair, in their 30s, and became a Norwood VII.
My father and his brother both began to lose hair in their early 20s, about age 24 for my dad I think. This occurred very slowly he was still Norwood 3a at 40. He's now a Norwood V going on VI, his brother is a VI.
I began losing hair, presumably, at 19 and it became noticeable at 20 (I really didn't notice until it was starkly obvious). At 27, I'm a Norwood 4 with thinning progressing to Norwood 4, the worst case of baldness I think my family has ever seen.
I can't help thinking then that the genetic defect gets worse every generation (hence my thread don't have children - I don't want a bald 15 year old son!)
Comment