Recoverup!

[Fixed by 35]

Why would it work, why wouldn't it I suppose.

As far as I can tell, TRX2, like minoxidil, was discovered by mistake. Prior to 2009, Whitfield was working on potassium ion channels in hepatitis patients. Presumably hair growth was a bi-product.

[KeepTheHair]

Really sucks that it says it takes 5+ months to see results. That is insane long time to "test" something without knowing it works. Also, a very long time to wait and see if it works. Besides that, they only start selling in a few months. So it will be a long time before we even know if it works or not.

[Fixed by 35]

Well, it's about the same time as propecia. Besides, hair loss should cease earlier than that; regrowth is the issue.

[KeepTheHair]

Well I might order it and try it out... doesn't seem that expensive.


I think I read somewhere on their website that they have a "device" that is in stealth mode? So they might bring out some device or something also?


btw we really need to start a TRX2 thread lol

[TheDude]

It seems like people have mixed opinions about whether TRX2 will be successful or not..

In summary the only way we'll know is if we try it or someone tries it and reports back.. in essence it seems like just another multi-vitamin

It does seem a little suspicious that no further evidence has been offered as to its supposed success: cessation of hair-loss, re-growth especially in the temple region, these are not minor claims. So in other words the product has quiet a lot to live up to.. i wonder if they will release supporting evidence on or near its release 10 Jan..

Someone mentioned it earlier but i have a request: can the guys who are going to try it please post photo's (before and after) or at the least progress reports

I've got my fingers crossed

[Fixed by 35]

I have to say I'd run a hair restoration company in exactly the same way as TRX2 are. I wouldn't release preliminary results before I got my patent, I wouldn't liaise with other members of the medical community and I wouldn't seek too much publicity in the news. The reason for that is because I would consider running a publicity department, which would be essential, as an unnecessary expense.

I would also consider what happens when trials are leaked to the press. In the UK, sometimes any scrap of knowledge in the public domain renders your product unpatentable, so that's a risk to avoid. Also, you tend to get inundated with sceptical and barbed questions from people who have spent a large part of their life being bald and getting scammed. Finally, I wouldn't work with hair transplant surgeons, because their business depends on drug therapy being ineffective at growing new hair; it is not in their interests for the product to work.

It makes far more sense to work in stealth, build a loyal but small following and then let the results speak for themselves. I'd want a knock on my door from a journalist asking how Patrick Stewart grew a quiff, not what stage my trials were at.

[KeepTheHair]

I am probably going to try it out once it gets released. I am just hoping they will provide some more info. If it works it will change our worlds for sure.

I'm hoping this is more than maintenance as they claim... growing hair in the temple and frontal regions seem unreal.

O well.