+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 45

Thread: histogen?

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    387

    Default

    Thanks I will.

  2. #12
    Senior Member BoSox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    703

    Default

    For somebody who's pessimistic, I think 10 years is too long. Especially with the results they have now.

  3. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    65

    Exclamation

    So do I. and i agree with Mlao.
    With all due respect to all the skeptics, i went back to the 90's in some forums and i can tell you there were never this many professional approaches to HM. Today we have presentations at international annual meetings. Like this year http://www.ishrs.org/PDF/18ASM_ProgramM ... -03-10.pdf

    Aderans will be presenting. So will others.

    We have peer-reviewed magazines and serious articles reviewed by specialists in the field.

    We have photographic evidence as well.

    I challenge any skeptic to look through the forums and archives and pull out something similar earlier than 2004.

    people who keep saying "5 years from now, yeah we heard that before" have no basis. They don't regard one important aspect: that science develops exponentially. A 1000 years ago things were moving so slowly that it seemed there was no exponential growth in development. But now there is so you cannot judge the 5 years between 2005-2010 with the same logic as you would 2010-2015. It is always faster.

    good luck.

  4. #14
    Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    883

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by crashul View Post
    people who keep saying "5 years from now, yeah we heard that before" have no basis. They don't regard one important aspect: that science develops exponentially.
    On the other hand, zero raised to any power is still zero.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    387

    Default

    Thanks crashful

  6. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gmonasco View Post
    On the other hand, zero raised to any power is still zero.
    But it's not zero if you look at the numbers both from Aderans and Histogen...it used to be zero-proof of concept, speculation, theories ...but when you have 100 patients enrolled and treated...it's a double zero but with a 1 in front. You do the maths.

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    251

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crashul View Post

    They don't regard one important aspect: that science develops exponentially. A 1000 years ago things were moving so slowly that it seemed there was no exponential growth in development. But now there is so you cannot judge the 5 years between 2005-2010 with the same logic as you would 2010-2015. It is always faster.
    Mr Kurzweil, is that you?

  8. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by clee984 View Post
    Mr Kurzweil, is that you?
    It's his spokesman, he's on vacation

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    618

    Default

    What's the difference between Histogen and the five year club? A product that they already know will work. In the last year a lot of knowledge has piled up that points to this as the solution, not least the Wnt and related gene research.

    All that is left to do is safety research. Now, the sceptics will say, ah, but what about dutasteride? That just needed safety research too. Well, the difference is that Avodart, as it is called, is a less well known drug than Propecia and blocks a form of DHT that is not well understood and is often less effective. Hardly worth marketing then, especially as it's rumoured to destroy some people's hairlines!

    In contrast, Histogen works. We know that already. They just need to check it is safe and what the right dosage and frequency is. I fully expect to have a full head of hair, if not the density, by 2014.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    143

    Default

    i really hope u guys are right but i think u are all in to be VERY disappointed. I just had a consult with a top 3 clinic and they said they get insider updates on things like this before everyone else does, and they told me this hm/cloning is a long ways off.

    Take that with a grain of salt if you want, like i said i hope im wrong, but i dont think i will be.

Similar Threads

  1. Any updates on histogen?
    By Thinning@30 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-10-2014, 04:23 AM
  2. exciting news from histogen
    By joe from staten island in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-01-2012, 08:49 PM
  3. About Histogen
    By mavikabir85 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-24-2010, 10:37 PM
  4. Histogen?s HSC Complex - An In Depth Discussion
    By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-26-2010, 07:56 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

1800 graft repair case results by Dr. Lindsey
Yesterday 08:38 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
Yesterday 08:38 AM
Navigating the German Job Market as a Kenyan Citizen
11-04-2023 06:31 AM
Last Post By Keegan212
Yesterday 03:51 AM
DR HAKAN DOGANAY/ 4500 GRAFTS / Implanter Pen+FUE
03-26-2024 04:15 PM
Last Post By Hakan Doganay, MD
03-26-2024 04:15 PM
The Mane Event for Thursday, June 15th, 2023
06-15-2023 02:59 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
03-26-2024 08:05 AM