Number of Folicular Units needed....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hairwarrior
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 6

    Number of Folicular Units needed....

    ... I just have a small (less than 1'in squared) area that is thinning, not bald - about 50% left, along the hair line. The rest of the hair line is strong.

    Why am I being told that it will take around a thousand FU's to remedy? Why so many. Due to the position, I think the loss is not even noticeable unless wet.
  • Winston
    Moderator
    • Mar 2009
    • 943

    #2
    If the loss isn’t even noticeable unless wet, why are you thinking about a hair transplant? I think your plan should be to try to keep what you have with medication.

    Comment

    • hairwarrior
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 6

      #3
      Agreed. That has been the plan for over 10 years now, and I have been largely successful.
      My only complaint is that sometimes if it parts down the middle, due to wind or whatever, it looks a little noticeable. I think I could stand to have a few more hairs put in there, but over 1000? There is no way. I know how thick a hair is.

      I think the quote included restoring the whole hair line?

      Comment

      • Winston
        Moderator
        • Mar 2009
        • 943

        #4
        I would not go down the hair transplant road if your only concern is that it looks a little thin when your hair is messed up. Get some concealer and give that a try.

        Comment

        • Dr. Lindsey
          IAHRS Recommended Hair Transplant Surgeon
          • Dec 2008
          • 6175

          #5
          I agree with Winston. Wait until you have a noticable problem before you start thinking about surgery. Don't do "preventative" transplantation in still existing, good hair. You'll just wind up killing hairs that might stay for a long time, and you'll deplete your donor supply and checkbook.

          Dr. Lindsey McLean VA
          William Lindsey, MD
          Member, International Alliance of Hair Restoration Surgeons
          View my IAHRS Profile

          Comment

          • gillenator
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2008
            • 1417

            #6
            I agree 100%. Hair restoration surgery should always be the last resort. Get as much bang and benefit in the coverage of your existing hair that you presently have. The more existing hair hair there is, the more there is to potentially shock out. Some of the shocked hair may not come back so when patients have that much existing hair, you can in theory lose more than you gain and then you begin to chase your hairloss.

            Diffussed thinners can be especially susceptible to this.
            "Gillenator"
            Independent Patient Advocate
            more.hair@verizon.net

            NOTE: I am not a physician and not employed by any doctor/clinic. My opinions are not medical advice nor are they the opinions of the following endorsing physicians: Dr. Bob True & Dr. Bob Dorin

            Comment

            • Dr. Glenn Charles
              IAHRS Recommended Hair Transplant Surgeon
              • Nov 2008
              • 2423

              #7
              Well said Dr. Lindsey. I was thinking about a response and I am glad I read yours first. Otherwise it would have looked like I just copied you. (Ditto)
              Dr. Glenn Charles
              Member, International Alliance of Hair Restoration Surgeons
              View my IAHRS Profile

              Comment

              • hairwarrior
                Junior Member
                • Jun 2010
                • 6

                #8
                Reasonable results

                What is wrong with this website that it is not obvious at all what to click to create a new thread?

                New question:

                I had my crown filled in over a year ago, using classical FUE procedures by a reputable Dr. noted on this site and I am surprised that the density is not very high, and it does not look totally full, and definitely not totally corrected. It was a pretty big job, and a very long strip of donors was extracted - from one side of head to other - practically scalped.

                Is it normal to need a 2nd procedure on the crown to get enough density to make it appear as if there was no hair loss at all?

                Any ideas what if anything went wrong?

                Should I go back to the same Dr?

                Comment

                • gillenator
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 1417

                  #9
                  It really depends on how much exisitng hair was in your crown area when you started. If your crown was bare or near a bare surface, then rebuilding coverage will demand a large amount of available donor. And as you stated, consider how large your last strip was.

                  Starting with little to no exisitng hair, and depending on the degree of coarseness of your hair, it takes more than one pass to produce enough visual coverage that you are describing.

                  What about the frontal third area of your scalp. is that thinning at all? If so, where will you get the donor to provide coverage to that highly visual impact area? You will want to think in terms where additional loss can occur in the future as well.

                  Are you taking finasteride or using minoxidil at all?
                  "Gillenator"
                  Independent Patient Advocate
                  more.hair@verizon.net

                  NOTE: I am not a physician and not employed by any doctor/clinic. My opinions are not medical advice nor are they the opinions of the following endorsing physicians: Dr. Bob True & Dr. Bob Dorin

                  Comment

                  Working...