-
Originally Posted by Arashi
Congratulations with the completion of your analysis !
Just so I understand correctly, in the recipient you only compared the post-op pics (showing the wounds) to the final results, right ? So any hair that was growing close to a wound most likely will have been counted as a regrown hair, that's what you mean with "Any hairs which grow very near to the wound sites may be mistaken as new hairs and interpreted as a positive result", right ? In that case that 17.5% 'regrowth' makes sense (it's most likely just hair that already was there).
Too bad we can't do a 100% perfect analysis. But when we keep in mind that 17.5% regrowth is really the best case scenario and that you'll have counted hair that was already there as regrowth, then most likely the "regrowth" is indeed a negative number and it's just a FUE like we've all been expecting it to be.
We'll see.... if I might get some more work done the way you saw with the pre-op pics. With some time and dedication, we wouldn't be far off from your "perfect" analysis.
Similar Threads
-
By Gjm127 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
Replies: 3
Last Post: 02-26-2015, 11:19 AM
-
By JJJJrS in forum Techniques in Possible Donor Regeneration and Multiplication
Replies: 58
Last Post: 02-01-2014, 07:03 PM
-
By HairlossAt15 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 72
Last Post: 06-20-2013, 09:47 PM
-
By tdo in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 4
Last Post: 12-19-2012, 09:10 AM
-
By alanrudy in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 2
Last Post: 08-03-2012, 11:24 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks