Permanent vs Temporary (Tricopigmentation) SMP

[hairhairhair456]

He seems to be posting this garbage in a number of other forums under the same name. Never seen him talking about anything other than permanent SMP in any of his posts!

Well that's obviously not true. I haven't posted any of what i have written here anywhere else. Also, i only have 7 posts on another forum, and you can clearly see me discussing and praising temporary SMP in them.

There were a few more posts on that forum where i stood up for the work, and reputation, of the owner of Ahead Ink, but they were deleted when a mod cleaned up the thread.

Oh and also in that thread, you would have seen me specifically standing up for Joe against someone who was directing gay slurs and over the top rudeness in his direction. That person was banned, and it was probably prompted by my input.

So... yeah.

It was funny because the guy that got banned accused me of being a tricopigmentation shill, and said that i was really the owner of Ahead Ink posting under another name, because i was standing up for he and Joe, and their work.

Then i come over here and get called a shill for permanent, because i am asking Joe to explain some of his statements he made on a site owned by the owner of Ahead Ink.

Some days a guy just cant win, eh?

Oh boy, this guy doesn’t quit. After two months hairhairhair456, a screen name that screams shill, BTW, is still trying to bait Joe Tillman. Yeah, this guy has no skin in the game, right The head tattoo people are really something. Please, take this garbage somewhere else, people are not interested in buying what you are selling. Who has time to bump a dead thread after two months and write a post like this unless they are very motivated and have some underlying ulterior motive? Ridiculous and so transparent.

Blah blah blah. You're clueless guy. Since you are repeating yourself, let me go ahead and repeat my previous response to you:

What's really funny about this is how it only seems to be a problem to you if I work in the industry. How about Joe? He set up a website to promote the cosmetic company he is tied to, where he trashes his competition using what i feel is inaccurate information, and he literally advertises the website as 'biased and proud of it'. That's no problem eh? And when pressed about this, he says 'nah im not even gonna read what you wrote, because i dont care'.

But if someone asks him to source/explain the bold claims he is making, then they are obviously a shill, whether they admit it or not, and up to no good for asking such questions. Alright man, whatever.

I love how you guys cant rebut any of the criticisms i have made, and can only engage in ad-hominem attacks, and speculation about my identity. More proof that i am on the right track here.

Here's an idea, how about unless you want to discuss the specific issues i have raised, you dont click on the thread. How about that? You can cry shill till you are blue in the face, but that isn't going to magically make any of my criticisms invalid.

Dont worry, this isn't going to go on forever. If you had bothered to read this thread, you would see that the evidence to support my claim that Joe/Ahead Ink are engaging in unscrupulous advertising, is rather damning. Perhaps that is why Joe stopped reading it (or at least 'supposedly' stopped reading). If Joe and Ahead Ink wont, or can't, rebut the observations i have raised, then so be it. But I'm giving them a chance. And if they dont, i will spread the word... just like Joe did when he encountered a similar situation. We all have to keep each other honest, right?

You should ask Joe why he told that one guy to send him his concerns over the website, and that he would be happy to look into them, but refused (supposedly) to even read mine. My guess is it's because Joe knew the other guy was a blubbering mess who wouldn't be able to make a coherent argument, but could quickly tell that i was on point. Hence the fingers in the ears 'i cant hear you' excuse.

I haven't even pulled out my Ace in the hole yet.