Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: SM

Threaded View

  1. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnMPB View Post
    If this is true....LOL

    In that case RU58841 likely works better than SM and we all know how hard that was dumped by the parent company.
    Its all based around sides though. If RU worked well but causes the normal sides of other AAs when it goes systemic then its not worth it. It would offer no real advantages over current treatments. So if it went systemic that is probably why they dropped it aside from the obvious investment/profit return issues

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

How do project management consulting firms manage?
10-12-2023 06:15 AM
Last Post By Rodneyy
Today 04:02 PM
Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Today 03:47 AM
Hair Loss - Who Do You Talk To? - The Bald Truth For May 10th, 2024
05-10-2024 01:28 PM
Last Post By JoeTillman
05-10-2024 01:28 PM
How we do hairline femininization with interview Dr. Lindsey
05-09-2024 07:33 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
05-09-2024 07:33 AM