SM

[BiqqieSmalls]

http://www.forbes.com/video/4842691252001/

Yah!

[Swooping]

Yeah, just that minoxidil is twice as good over the same treatment period LOL.

Unfortunately this isn't going anywhere.

[allTheGoodNamesAreTaken]

****ing Forbes!!! I can never get onto that website, something about firefox adblockers.

[TooMuchHairWontKillYou]

Yeah, just that minoxidil is twice as good over the same treatment period LOL.

Unfortunately this isn't going anywhere.

You are so wrong swoop... If SM can achieve high response rate and can maintain or get 10% regrowth it will be huge. I promise

Aaand we don't know 3+ months statistics.
Comparison between minox and SM for 3 month period may be incorrect.

[BoSox]

The more research I do on SM the more excited I get. The man is out to cure baldness, lets try to be less negative and let the man do it!

Godspeed.

[Swooping]

You are so wrong swoop... If SM can achieve high response rate and can maintain or get 10% regrowth it will be huge. I promise

If you say so. Hope you have godly powers mate.

[JohnMPB]

Yeah, just that minoxidil is twice as good over the same treatment period LOL.

Unfortunately this isn't going anywhere.

If this is true....LOL

In that case RU58841 likely works better than SM and we all know how hard that was dumped by the parent company.

[burtandernie]

If this is true....LOL

In that case RU58841 likely works better than SM and we all know how hard that was dumped by the parent company.

Its all based around sides though. If RU worked well but causes the normal sides of other AAs when it goes systemic then its not worth it. It would offer no real advantages over current treatments. So if it went systemic that is probably why they dropped it aside from the obvious investment/profit return issues