-
SM
-
Yeah, just that minoxidil is twice as good over the same treatment period LOL.
Unfortunately this isn't going anywhere.
-
****ing Forbes!!! I can never get onto that website, something about firefox adblockers.
-
Originally Posted by Swooping
Yeah, just that minoxidil is twice as good over the same treatment period LOL.
Unfortunately this isn't going anywhere.
You are so wrong swoop... If SM can achieve high response rate and can maintain or get 10% regrowth it will be huge. I promise
Aaand we don't know 3+ months statistics.
Comparison between minox and SM for 3 month period may be incorrect.
-
Senior Member
The more research I do on SM the more excited I get. The man is out to cure baldness, lets try to be less negative and let the man do it!
Godspeed.
-
Originally Posted by TooMuchHairWontKillYou
You are so wrong swoop... If SM can achieve high response rate and can maintain or get 10% regrowth it will be huge. I promise
If you say so. Hope you have godly powers mate.
-
Originally Posted by Swooping
Yeah, just that minoxidil is twice as good over the same treatment period LOL.
Unfortunately this isn't going anywhere.
If this is true....LOL
In that case RU58841 likely works better than SM and we all know how hard that was dumped by the parent company.
-
Originally Posted by JohnMPB
If this is true....LOL
In that case RU58841 likely works better than SM and we all know how hard that was dumped by the parent company.
Its all based around sides though. If RU worked well but causes the normal sides of other AAs when it goes systemic then its not worth it. It would offer no real advantages over current treatments. So if it went systemic that is probably why they dropped it aside from the obvious investment/profit return issues
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks