+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: SM

  1. #1

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    803

    Default

    Yeah, just that minoxidil is twice as good over the same treatment period LOL.

    Unfortunately this isn't going anywhere.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    342

    Default

    ****ing Forbes!!! I can never get onto that website, something about firefox adblockers.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Swooping View Post
    Yeah, just that minoxidil is twice as good over the same treatment period LOL.

    Unfortunately this isn't going anywhere.
    You are so wrong swoop... If SM can achieve high response rate and can maintain or get 10% regrowth it will be huge. I promise

    Aaand we don't know 3+ months statistics.
    Comparison between minox and SM for 3 month period may be incorrect.

  5. #5
    Senior Member BoSox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    703

    Default

    The more research I do on SM the more excited I get. The man is out to cure baldness, lets try to be less negative and let the man do it!

    Godspeed.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    803

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TooMuchHairWontKillYou View Post
    You are so wrong swoop... If SM can achieve high response rate and can maintain or get 10% regrowth it will be huge. I promise
    If you say so. Hope you have godly powers mate.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    383

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Swooping View Post
    Yeah, just that minoxidil is twice as good over the same treatment period LOL.

    Unfortunately this isn't going anywhere.
    If this is true....LOL

    In that case RU58841 likely works better than SM and we all know how hard that was dumped by the parent company.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnMPB View Post
    If this is true....LOL

    In that case RU58841 likely works better than SM and we all know how hard that was dumped by the parent company.
    Its all based around sides though. If RU worked well but causes the normal sides of other AAs when it goes systemic then its not worth it. It would offer no real advantages over current treatments. So if it went systemic that is probably why they dropped it aside from the obvious investment/profit return issues

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

1800 graft repair case results by Dr. Lindsey
Yesterday 08:38 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
Yesterday 08:38 AM
Navigating the German Job Market as a Kenyan Citizen
11-04-2023 06:31 AM
Last Post By Keegan212
Yesterday 03:51 AM
DR HAKAN DOGANAY/ 4500 GRAFTS / Implanter Pen+FUE
03-26-2024 04:15 PM
Last Post By Hakan Doganay, MD
03-26-2024 04:15 PM
The Mane Event for Thursday, June 15th, 2023
06-15-2023 02:59 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
03-26-2024 08:05 AM