Results 1 to 10 of 35

Threaded View

  1. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    545

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Follicle734 View Post
    Maybe doctors don't like paying for quality, but in my previous posts you ignored the point on the actual technology. There isn't a doctor in the world that can operate and extract grafts for hours upon hours at with sub micron level precisions. I am curious to hear your thoughts as to how a surgeon can justify not offering his/her patient the most accurate and efficient way of harvesting grafts?? Please answer the question. How do you not see a benefit in harvesting grafts more accurately and faster keeping them out of the body for less time?
    If we are going tit for tat you have not given me your thoughts on the below:

    What do you think of these reports and studies?

    https://www.drugwatch.com/davinci-surgery/

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/robotic...ows-1412715786

    https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/...urgeries/?_r=0

    http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/810490

    To answer your question, from what has been presented most doctors don’t do much more than 1000 to 1500 grafts per ARTAS hair transplant. If the robot works so quickly then we don’t really know if it’s "sub-micron precision" was even tested for "hours upon hours.” If it was then the ARTAS company should present the data. Currently your point is moot since there is no evidence that the ARTAS has performed well for hours upon hours. It’s just theoretical unless you have some evidence to present. By the way, who said I could not see the benefit of this type of technology? If the grafts are better, the precision is better and the outcomes are better than of course it would be better. No one is questioning that, but just regurgitating company marketing language does not prove anything. Let me be clear, I am all for this technology. I became interested in it after hearing Spencer Kobren talk about it and interview doctors like Dr. Bernstein and Dr. Ziering on his show. Before that I thought it was just a gimmick. I am now starting to question it’s real value based on the negative things I’ve been reading on other forums, the lack of discussion about it on Spencer’s show and this forum, even by the doctors who use it, and because of your solicitation for investors.
    Last edited by Winston; 03-01-2017 at 05:06 PM. Reason: Delphi, please refer to our posting rules and TOS.

Similar Threads

  1. Jason Gardiner's Hair Transplant with Dr. Craig Ziering
    By tbtadmin in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 01-06-2013, 01:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

How do project management consulting firms manage?
10-12-2023 06:15 AM
Last Post By Rodneyy
Today 04:02 PM
Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Today 03:47 AM
Hair Loss - Who Do You Talk To? - The Bald Truth For May 10th, 2024
05-10-2024 01:28 PM
Last Post By JoeTillman
05-10-2024 01:28 PM
How we do hairline femininization with interview Dr. Lindsey
05-09-2024 07:33 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
05-09-2024 07:33 AM