What limits the donor area? I want them all

[MartinSchmiede]

Hey guys,

If you google the "undercut" hair style, you will probably see this hair style where there is no(t much) hair at the sides and full hair on the top.

So I wonder, what actually limits the donor area? Doesn't the donor area actually can be more "productive", if the patient decides that he wants more grafts transplanted than the surgeon recommends? Isnt his recommendation only his valuable but subjective viewpoint?

Do you think it looks really ugly when there is more hair taken out from the donor area than the surgeon recommends? What can happen? I mean when you are standing in line for something, the guy behind you might notice it. But you look into the mirror and see full hair on the top.

So don't we actually have enough hair also to combat higher NW scales (5<) on the cost of the side and back hair?

Doesn't one look like an native american warrior? Imagine an I think it would look fine. Check out:

http://polpix.sueddeutsche.com/polopoly_fs/1.402171.1357658356!/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/900x600/image.jpg

I have thought about this and want to hear your ideas. The disadvatage of costs is secondary now.

[rappy]

So basically as I understand it, the whole donor area can be harvested and moved to the top?
Why haven't we seen such transplant before?

Rashid, it's a real pleasure reading your posts.

[DAVE52]

Do you want to go through life looking like that

[rappy]

I honestly don't know. I'm a little far from that. I was just more curious and wanted to know my options. It is not impossible i would do that if needed.

[hanginginthewire]

I have had the same thought Martin. Scars suck but given the alternative...