+ Reply to Thread
Page 12 of 34 FirstFirst ... 2 10 11 12 13 14 22 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 340
  1. #111
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    713

    Default

    You ranted a lot about the scientific process but did not address any one of my points about your science. Also, propecia is very effective at stopping hair loss in most people who take it (like 80 percent or something). If non-androgen compounds were so important to turning on the AR and the balding process, then why is this true? Also again, why does your theory imply that replicel "won't work"? if the problem lies in the AR, then surely replacing AR sensitive cells with new ones is a good idea. So is something like histogen which essentially drowns out the AR's signals. You make very sweeping statements about what will and wont work, and then show no proof that your ideas work at all. It's very hard to take any of this seriously when you have no evidence, even if your idea is legit, which it might be. How is this supposed to be useful to anyone if you don't put it into action? I don't think you're trying to make money (though maybe you should be). If you have proof that it works and can get hair scientists to back you up, I'm sure with some effort you could get things rolling somewhere, even if its japan or europe and not is the US.

  2. #112
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sdsurfin View Post
    You ranted a lot about the scientific process but did not address any one of my points about your science. Also, propecia is very effective at stopping hair loss in most people who take it (like 80 percent or something). If non-androgen compounds were so important to turning on the AR and the balding process, then why is this true? Also again, why does your theory imply that replicel "won't work"? if the problem lies in the AR, then surely replacing AR sensitive cells with new ones is a good idea. So is something like histogen which essentially drowns out the AR's signals. You make very sweeping statements about what will and wont work, and then show no proof that your ideas work at all. It's very hard to take any of this seriously when you have no evidence, even if your idea is legit, which it might be. How is this supposed to be useful to anyone if you don't put it into action? I don't think you're trying to make money (though maybe you should be). If you have proof that it works and can get hair scientists to back you up, I'm sure with some effort you could get things rolling somewhere, even if its japan or europe and not is the US.
    propecia is not 80% effective in stopping hair loss... that's complete BS

  3. #113
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesst11 View Post
    propecia is not 80% effective in stopping hair loss... that's complete BS
    youre right james, propecia stops the balding process in 90+ percent of people, not only 80% LOL

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21910805

  4. #114
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sdsurfin View Post
    You ranted a lot about the scientific process but did not address any one of my points about your science. Also, propecia is very effective at stopping hair loss in most people who take it (like 80 percent or something). If non-androgen compounds were so important to turning on the AR and the balding process, then why is this true? Also again, why does your theory imply that replicel "won't work"? if the problem lies in the AR, then surely replacing AR sensitive cells with new ones is a good idea. So is something like histogen which essentially drowns out the AR's signals. You make very sweeping statements about what will and wont work, and then show no proof that your ideas work at all. It's very hard to take any of this seriously when you have no evidence, even if your idea is legit, which it might be. How is this supposed to be useful to anyone if you don't put it into action? I don't think you're trying to make money (though maybe you should be). If you have proof that it works and can get hair scientists to back you up, I'm sure with some effort you could get things rolling somewhere, even if its japan or europe and not is the US.
    What happened with Follicept?

  5. #115
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tenma View Post
    youre right james, propecia stops the balding process in 90+ percent of people, not only 80% LOL

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21910805
    It didn't help me at all! To see any result you need 3 to 6 months, then after 1/2 years it does not work for most guys. That is my observation. Maybe wrong, or right!

  6. #116
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Yeah, the 90+% wake up feeling like shit and can't get it up/gyno too. Fin definitely can help/work to halt or slow the inevitable , but for a lot of people that comes at a steep price.

  7. #117
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tenma View Post
    youre right james, propecia stops the balding process in 90+ percent of people, not only 80% LOL

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21910805
    I have thoroughly read hundreds of research papers and published articles through my 6 years attaining my masters degree in cellular and molecular bio, and have even published two myself. I know for a fact that this is complete bullshit.

  8. #118
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,111

    Default

    I would say that propecia HELPS MAINTAIN in 50-60% of people who regularly use it and can bare the side effects. That is more accurate.

  9. #119
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesst11 View Post
    I would say that propecia HELPS MAINTAIN in 50-60% of people who regularly use it and can bare the side effects. That is more accurate.
    Do you have facts to back that up with?

  10. #120
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,111

    Default

    nope, that's why I prefaced that statement with, "i would say"... believe what you want to man, but 80-90% is WAY OFF.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

purchase requisition in business central
12-19-2023 05:38 AM
Last Post By Briam1930
Today 05:47 AM
Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Yesterday 02:28 PM
Surgeons in SE Asia (Thailand)
10-20-2018 10:30 AM
by martino
Last Post By EFab
04-17-2024 08:34 AM
My FUE Into FUT Scar Result Revealed After 5 Years
04-15-2024 10:10 AM
Last Post By JoeTillman
04-15-2024 10:10 AM