-
Member
Originally Posted by allTheGoodNamesAreTaken
It does work though!! There is a presentation that shows clear, cosmetically significant frontal regrowth at 19 weeks, from a single treatment, that is as good as any recovery I have ever seen aside from a hair transplant. I don't know why this is continually ignored, other than possibly because it's on a woman. That's still a working product.
Otherwise it would probably make no sense to push trough and putting it to the market. What I have seen is impressive in that time. I do not think that they would come up with a treatment that is less effective then the existing ones. Only with hair transplants you can grow hair back like that.
-
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Arieux
I agree @allTheGoodNamesAreTaken. Its results are promissing. And in my opinion there is a big possiblity to have Histogen in Japan even before 2018. The one problem is that new hair would be, as far as I know, again susceptible to minaturisation. I was wondering about the theoretical conjuction of those treatments: firstly regrowth from Histogen and then Replicel for maintanance.
I think that even for those of us with severe recession such as myself, the combination of Histogen + Replicel (and potentially a hair transplant) could be an effective cure. Will probably cost us a lot of money though.
-
Originally Posted by Hubris
I think that even for those of us with severe recession such as myself, the combination of Histogen + Replicel (and potentially a hair transplant) could be an effective cure. Will probably cost us a lot of money though.
It's possible. Replicel seems to be more popular these days but not so long ago I looked at Histogen as the best bet. I've not seen any replicel 'after' photos but people seem so enthusiastic for that one... it'd be smart to start putting a bit of money aside now really.
-
Originally Posted by allTheGoodNamesAreTaken
It does work though!! There is a presentation that shows clear, cosmetically significant frontal regrowth at 19 weeks, from a single treatment, that is as good as any recovery I have ever seen aside from a hair transplant. I don't know why this is continually ignored, other than possibly because it's on a woman. That's still a working product.
One presentation may show good results but pics from the last trial were nothing to rave about.
-
Originally Posted by nameless
One presentation may show good results but pics from the last trial were nothing to rave about.
It's enough to keep me interested. Which company/team out there has anything better to show for their efforts? Plus this presentation I'm talking about is from a while ago now, they might have upped their success rate since then... it was only a single treatment only 19 weeks afterwards. Maybe more treatments + more time = better.
-
Originally Posted by allTheGoodNamesAreTaken
It's enough to keep me interested. Which company/team out there has anything better to show for their efforts? Plus this presentation I'm talking about is from a while ago now, they might have upped their success rate since then... it was only a single treatment only 19 weeks afterwards. Maybe more treatments + more time = better.
Yes, more injections may result in better results but in order to get more injections you will have to take repeated trips to Asia plus pay for more injections. In order to end up where you want to be you may have to spend a lot more money than you care to.
-
Originally Posted by nameless
1 post and it's inane.
I used to back Histogen but their results were disappointing. You need to look over their past results, which are mediocre.
Not true. This is a new account and I've been observing Histogen since well before you were a member here.
Histogen unlike replicel are growing hair on humans. It's baffling the replicel hype vs the reality of what others have achieved.
I personally want what Histogen have to offer. Mediocre to you isn't necessarily mediocre to my situation.
So I'll stick to my guns. You've expressed your opinion (which is all it is) now so do you have to keep on doing it???
-
More truth: Histogen were growing hair on humans when replicel were growing hair on mice.
-
Replicel hype when it should be shiseido hype
-
Originally Posted by nameless
Yes, more injections may result in better results but in order to get more injections you will have to take repeated trips to Asia plus pay for more injections. In order to end up where you want to be you may have to spend a lot more money than you care to.
Well first thing's first, let's start with something that actually does what it's supposed to. I'll worry about cost later.
Similar Threads
-
By FlightTL in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 25
Last Post: 08-15-2014, 09:29 AM
-
By baldat18 in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 3
Last Post: 07-19-2011, 06:16 PM
-
By Master King in forum Non Surgical Hair Replacement
Replies: 5
Last Post: 05-26-2011, 10:27 PM
-
By tbtadmin in forum The Bald Truth: Show Archives
Replies: 2
Last Post: 08-08-2009, 09:12 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks