Histogen in the hair congress

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hairmore
    Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 80

    #31
    Originally posted by Hubris
    I think the main problem they have is funding.
    This is the same thing I thought, I actually think that hair loss is not a priority in the research of any cooperation that sells pharmaceuticals. Perhaps also because market research has shown that people are sceptical about hair loss treatments in general and would only buy something revolutionary. But that is an assumption as well.

    Comment

    • Hairmore
      Member
      • Oct 2015
      • 80

      #32
      Originally posted by Hubris
      I think the main problem they have is funding.
      This is the same thing I thought, I actually think that hair loss is not a priority in the research of any cooperation that sells pharmaceuticals. Perhaps also because market research has shown that people are sceptical about hair loss treatments in general and would only buy something revolutionary. But that is an assumption as well.

      Comment

      • ShookOnes
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2014
        • 213

        #33
        Their results absolutely just shit on replicel's lol. Wish it was them partnered with shiseido

        Comment

        • Gremlin142
          Junior Member
          • May 2014
          • 27

          #34
          Why is anyone doubting Histogen?

          First off, their results are by far the most impressive and well documented when it comes to hair regeneration out there. They have been around since 2007 and still exist today with a larger product line and more people working with them. They have now successfully raised money for three rounds of financing. They have partnered with large firms to deliver, market and raise cash for a variety of their products. They seem very legit, and are now mentioning an IPO for 2016. They are also speaking at this years hair congress. If this was a scam, it most likely would have fallen apart years ago. Also, their CEO is a woman, individuals who are much less likely to be psychopaths. They have been careful and diligent about everything they have presented. I strongly believe this may be our first real break-through company.

          Comment

          • Ziggyz123
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2015
            • 368

            #35
            Originally posted by Gremlin142
            First off, their results are by far the most impressive and well documented when it comes to hair regeneration out there. They have been around since 2007 and still exist today with a larger product line and more people working with them. They have now successfully raised money for three rounds of financing. They have partnered with large firms to deliver, market and raise cash for a variety of their products. They seem very legit, and are now mentioning an IPO for 2016. They are also speaking at this years hair congress. If this was a scam, it most likely would have fallen apart years ago. Also, their CEO is a woman, individuals who are much less likely to be psychopaths. They have been careful and diligent about everything they have presented. I strongly believe this may be our first real break-through company.
            Was with you until " Also, their CEO is a woman, individuals who are much less likely to be psychopaths."

            Comment

            • Hairmore
              Member
              • Oct 2015
              • 80

              #36
              Sometimes companies do IPO because they are getting broke.

              Comment

              • ShookOnes
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2014
                • 213

                #37
                Originally posted by Hairmore
                Sometimes companies do IPO because they are getting broke.
                They raised 10m don't think they're about to declare bankruptcy

                Comment

                Working...