+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Summary

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hairismylife View Post
    You have had a HT, no wonder you're such a naysayer. I understand how you feel. You don't want anything to come soon right? Everybody please note that Swooping have had a HT while reading his every negative comment on every science-supported treatment such as PGD2 stuff.
    Positional good theory.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    Could CB get approved sooner with that 21st century cures act? I mean dont we have like 20 or 30 years of AA experience already. Another 2 or 3 years for what appears by all accounts to be a pretty safe topical seems kind of silly to me.
    If it exhibits all the same effects and actions of the many other AAs like propecia and its rendered into some harmless steroid upon hitting the blood stream why do we have to wait 3 years to replace the much more dangerous propecia? Doesnt make much logical sense to me and it increases the costs when it comes out to get back all that wasted money. If it was some new mechanism of action I could understand, but we dont have AAs out there already there must be like 50 of them already.
    A lot of people would like to skip fin and just use this stuff instead. Can it be a lot more dangerous than the current treatments? I mean its topical only.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by burtandernie View Post
    Could CB get approved sooner with that 21st century cures act? I mean dont we have like 20 or 30 years of AA experience already. Another 2 or 3 years for what appears by all accounts to be a pretty safe topical seems kind of silly to me.
    If it exhibits all the same effects and actions of the many other AAs like propecia and its rendered into some harmless steroid upon hitting the blood stream why do we have to wait 3 years to replace the much more dangerous propecia? Doesnt make much logical sense to me and it increases the costs when it comes out to get back all that wasted money. If it was some new mechanism of action I could understand, but we dont have AAs out there already there must be like 50 of them already.
    A lot of people would like to skip fin and just use this stuff instead. Can it be a lot more dangerous than the current treatments? I mean its topical only.
    CB is unfortunately out in 6 years not 3

  4. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Swooping View Post
    Next 5 years at minimum imo;

    Minoxidil
    Finasteride

    Furthermore you have a very fast expanding hair transplant industry (fact).

    Feels bad. Miracles can happen though. Let's hope that the hair congress brings something new maybe.

    Bim, Seti, and SM could all come out in the next 3 years and Shiseido is claiming they'll have something by 2018. We'll need a little luck, but I highly doubt in 2020 we'll still be using minox and fin.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    2020 honestly isnt good enough. 5 years is a long long time I mean thats like 1/16 of your entire life if you died at 80 so thats a long time to wait. So no one thinks the 21st century cure act will do anything at all? Guess I better go gamble my health and try finasteride. I cant wait 5 years.

  6. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    86

    Default

    In about 3 years I am going to have HT (if Replicel fails). I really hope, that after it I will be using a new treatment to prevent further hair loss instead of fin.

Similar Threads

  1. Summary of upcoming treatments 2014/2015
    By James7 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 11-27-2013, 07:52 PM
  2. Could we have a brief summary of Future Treatments?
    By sausage in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-06-2013, 09:50 AM
  3. Dr. Lindsey summary of 2 strip cases to treat radiation caused hairloss after cancer
    By Dr. Lindsey in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-20-2013, 10:19 AM
  4. Cutting edge products summary
    By Kiwi in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-04-2012, 06:54 PM
  5. Dr. Hasson/ 3328 Grafts/One Session/HD VIDEO Topic Summary:
    By Jotronic in forum Hair Transplant Results By IAHRS Recommended Surgeons
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-01-2011, 08:26 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Today 03:19 AM
Surgeons in SE Asia (Thailand)
10-20-2018 10:30 AM
by martino
Last Post By EFab
Yesterday 08:34 AM
My FUE Into FUT Scar Result Revealed After 5 Years
04-15-2024 10:10 AM
Last Post By JoeTillman
04-15-2024 10:10 AM
2 operations with Asmed, Dr. Erdogan - 2007 and 2016
10-06-2020 10:53 AM
Last Post By sicore8826
04-12-2024 02:41 PM