Tweet
Regrowing your own hair, for me, is significantly superior to any transplant whether from donor area or lab cultured follices.
One is actually reversing the effects of AGA and rescuing your crippled follices one way or the other, while hair transplants just give up on those follicles and overtake them with DHT-resistent ones.
I understand this is more of a 'philosophical' difference, but I still prefer the former one. (Not to say that I would never cave in for a donor or culture transplant-type operation).
Plus, in more practical terms, no matter how good the operation, there is a level of naturalitt with your own hairline that just cannot be matched 100% with a transplant.
So, for me, even a 1-1.5 NW reversal with Replicel is huge! Couple that with halting further loss, I could definitely consider paying 4-5k$ aside from the travel costs.
But 6% increase is really nothing. If it's guaranteed to stop hair loss, without anh side effects, but with that level of regrowth, I'd lower my offering to aroun 2-2.5k$.
With NW0-7, I guess we can say 1 NW reversal is ~12-14% density. So, theoretically, they need double, quadruple their success if we wanna start talking about significant cosmetic reversal. And maybe that is somewhat feasible if we consider that Phase 1 was a low dose safety trial. Unless that 6% was a peak already and Phase 2 has been going terrible (which is unlikely consider Replicel's apparent momentum).
So we shall see
One is actually reversing the effects of AGA and rescuing your crippled follices one way or the other, while hair transplants just give up on those follicles and overtake them with DHT-resistent ones.
I understand this is more of a 'philosophical' difference, but I still prefer the former one. (Not to say that I would never cave in for a donor or culture transplant-type operation).
Plus, in more practical terms, no matter how good the operation, there is a level of naturalitt with your own hairline that just cannot be matched 100% with a transplant.
So, for me, even a 1-1.5 NW reversal with Replicel is huge! Couple that with halting further loss, I could definitely consider paying 4-5k$ aside from the travel costs.
But 6% increase is really nothing. If it's guaranteed to stop hair loss, without anh side effects, but with that level of regrowth, I'd lower my offering to aroun 2-2.5k$.
With NW0-7, I guess we can say 1 NW reversal is ~12-14% density. So, theoretically, they need double, quadruple their success if we wanna start talking about significant cosmetic reversal. And maybe that is somewhat feasible if we consider that Phase 1 was a low dose safety trial. Unless that 6% was a peak already and Phase 2 has been going terrible (which is unlikely consider Replicel's apparent momentum).
So we shall see
Comment