I am new to this community and wanted to get some inputs. I am in my early thirties and considering undergoing a hair transplant. I have done online research and visited few doctors as well. I have ended getting mixed reviews:
- Doctors who have the Artas system (and also do manual) seem to claim that it is better than manual FUE because the machine provides more standardization , accuracy, better results and less scarring. These doctors have quoted the same price whether it is done manually or using Artas.
- Doctors who don't has Artas claim it is not better than manual FUE and results in poor results, wasted follicles and more scarring.
What are some of the considerations in deciding whether to go with manual FUE or ARTAS ? For those who have gone through this decided was it mainly driven by the Doctor you selected ?
Appreciate your response.
- Doctors who have the Artas system (and also do manual) seem to claim that it is better than manual FUE because the machine provides more standardization , accuracy, better results and less scarring. These doctors have quoted the same price whether it is done manually or using Artas.
- Doctors who don't has Artas claim it is not better than manual FUE and results in poor results, wasted follicles and more scarring.
What are some of the considerations in deciding whether to go with manual FUE or ARTAS ? For those who have gone through this decided was it mainly driven by the Doctor you selected ?
Appreciate your response.
Comment