+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 21 of 21
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    Yeah well in reality there have numerous things over the years they dropped or shelved like RU, ascj 9, and many others that might have been better than propecia. If something isnt a lot better than propecia which most AAs arent, then its hard to justify the money a lot of the time. That is why a lot of stuff similar to propecia never came out and most of it had some sides similar to propecia. Not to mention when propecia was under patent why bother with something just like it?
    Stuff like RU was the most potent AA every made but if its not significantly better than propecia who is going to waste that kind of money finishing it?

Similar Threads

  1. TricoScience Fact Sheet
    By tbtadmin in forum Replicel
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-19-2013, 08:31 PM
  2. Fact or fiction: fin is only effective for 5 to 6 years?
    By Kirby_ in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-08-2012, 08:49 AM
  3. The MOST important fact to remember!!!!
    By Jotronic in forum Hair Transplant: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 03-26-2012, 01:15 PM
  4. An Interesting Fact on UK Patent Law
    By Fixed by 35 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-03-2010, 04:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth