+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 70
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    34

    Default Anyone have any news from Lauster/Jahoda teams?

    Their methods hold the key to the cure imo, but it is a shame that they are silent for so long and didn't make any progress on it, or at least didn't reveal any information from what I know... Seems that Lauster just created some brand new hair follicle and don't give a crap anymore, truly an outrage.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liba View Post
    Their methods hold the key to the cure imo, but it is a shame that they are silent for so long and didn't make any progress on it, or at least didn't reveal any information from what I know... Seems that Lauster just created some brand new hair follicle and don't give a crap anymore, truly an outrage.
    Dr. Lauster basically found the cure 5 years ago. If you think nothing has been done since, you have to assume they either gave up (unlikely) or hit a road block (also unlikely). However, 5 years ago they were already able to create follicles albeit small ones.

    They've got the cure.... thats not even a question except that the university is holding the patent. You want the cure? You're going to have to make a case that you're worthy of living a better life, because even if this got released, you'd still get screwed because this is supposed to be for testing cosmetics instead of animal testing. So yeah... bald men are continuously getting snubbed.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hellouser View Post
    Dr. Lauster basically found the cure 5 years ago. If you think nothing has been done since, you have to assume they either gave up (unlikely) or hit a road block (also unlikely). However, 5 years ago they were already able to create follicles albeit small ones.

    They've got the cure.... thats not even a question except that the university is holding the patent. You want the cure? You're going to have to make a case that you're worthy of living a better life, because even if this got released, you'd still get screwed because this is supposed to be for testing cosmetics instead of animal testing. So yeah... bald men are continuously getting snubbed.
    That follicle that they created you cant use it for cosmetic surgery, because that follicle is tiny and dont have gene expressions.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FooFighter View Post
    That follicle that they created you cant use it for cosmetic surgery, because that follicle is tiny and dont have gene expressions.
    That was 5 years ago.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    4,423

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FooFighter View Post
    That follicle that they created you cant use it for cosmetic surgery, because that follicle is tiny and dont have gene expressions.
    That was 5 years ago. You can be pretty sure things have changed since.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    59

    Default

    I think they solved the gene expression, I believe the problem is, being able to implant it and having it survive. I know dr gardner talked about needing the right environment for the follicle to survive. The world vongress for hair meeting is in November this year, in Miami. so we will be able to see how dr lauster is progressing. Also wake forest university are working on lab grown follicles too. I just wish Desmond could get in touch with Dr Lauster to see how they are doing, instead of us waiting a whole year to find out.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hellouser View Post
    Dr. Lauster basically found the cure 5 years ago. If you think nothing has been done since, you have to assume they either gave up (unlikely) or hit a road block (also unlikely). However, 5 years ago they were already able to create follicles albeit small ones.

    They've got the cure.... thats not even a question except that the university is holding the patent. You want the cure? You're going to have to make a case that you're worthy of living a better life, because even if this got released, you'd still get screwed because this is supposed to be for testing cosmetics instead of animal testing. So yeah... bald men are continuously getting snubbed.
    Damn I hope we can do something to get them do the things they ought to do... At least remind them how great it can be if they put their method in to hair loss treatment..

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikes23 View Post
    I think they solved the gene expression, I believe the problem is, being able to implant it and having it survive. I know dr gardner talked about needing the right environment for the follicle to survive. The world vongress for hair meeting is in November this year, in Miami. so we will be able to see how dr lauster is progressing. Also wake forest university are working on lab grown follicles too. I just wish Desmond could get in touch with Dr Lauster to see how they are doing, instead of us waiting a whole year to find out.
    Yeah that's kinda good news at least... Have they decided to come to the meeting?

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    turkey
    Posts
    57

    Default

    A Johoda ' team ?
    Not to clone another team ?

  10. #10
    Senior Member noisette's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    248

    Post A multi-organ chip co-culture of neurospheres and liver equivalents for long-term sub

    Hello guys, I have a recent paper (2/2015) from Lauster. This can help ?

    A multi-organ chip co-culture of neurospheres and liver equivalents for long-term substance testing

    Journal of Biotechnology (Impact Factor: 2.88). 02/2015; DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.02.002
    Source: PubMed


    ABSTRACT Current in vitro and animal tests for drug development are failing to emulate the systemic organ complexity of the human body and, therefore, often do not accurately predict drug toxicity, leading to high attrition rates in clinical studies (Paul et al., 2010). The phylogenetic distance between humans and laboratory animals is enormous, this affects the transferability of animal data on the efficacy of neuroprotective drugs. Therefore, many neuroprotective treatments that have shown promise in animals have not been successful when transferred to humans (Dragunow, 2008; Gibbons and Dragunow, 2010). We present a multi-organ chip capable of maintaining 3D tissues derived from various cell sources in a combined media circuit which bridges the gap in systemic and human tests. A steady state co-culture of human artificial liver microtissues and human neurospheres exposed to fluid flow over two weeks in the multi-organ chip has successfully proven its long-term performance. Daily lactate dehydrogenase activity measurements of the medium and immunofluorescence end-point staining proved the viability of the tissues and the maintenance of differentiated cellular phenotypes. Moreover, the lactate production and glucose consumption values of the tissues cultured indicated that a stable steady-state was achieved after 6 days of co-cultivation. The neurospheres remained differentiated neurons over the two-week cultivation in the multi-organ chip, proven by qPCR and immunofluorescence of the neuronal markers βIII-tubulin and microtubule-associated protein-2. Additionally, a two-week toxicity assay with a repeated substance exposure to the neurotoxic 2,5-hexanedione in two different concentrations induced high apoptosis within the neurospheres and liver microtissues, as shown by a strong increase of lactate dehydrogenase activity in the medium. The principal finding of the exposure of the co-culture to 2,5-hexanedione was that not only toxicity profiles of two different doses could be discriminated, but also that the co-cultures were more sensitive to the substance compared to respective single-tissue cultures in the multi-organ-chip. Thus, we provide here a new in vitro tool which might be utilized to predict the safety and efficacy of substances in clinical studies more accurately in the future.
    Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Similar Threads

  1. Clinical trial starting using Jahoda's method !
    By Arashi in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 127
    Last Post: 01-05-2015, 02:07 PM
  2. ishrs-2013: Dr Wesley and ... Jahoda !!
    By Arashi in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 10-24-2013, 03:08 PM
  3. Jahoda
    By NeedHairASAP in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-17-2013, 03:34 PM
  4. What's the deal with Dr Lauster?
    By Pentarou in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-03-2013, 11:37 AM
  5. Dr. Lauster HM research
    By FearTheLoss in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 01-29-2013, 09:32 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By SarahCarter
Yesterday 04:24 PM
Scar Grafting with Dr Cole
06-21-2012 02:00 PM
Last Post By northeastguy
Yesterday 10:14 AM
Misinformation Online - The Bald Truth, Friday April 19th, 2024
04-19-2024 02:36 PM
Last Post By JoeTillman
04-19-2024 02:36 PM
purchase requisition in business central
12-19-2023 05:38 AM
Last Post By David9232
04-19-2024 11:39 AM
An inconvenient truth about FUE
04-19-2024 07:24 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
04-19-2024 07:24 AM