-
Thanks for the info Joker.
If they are right about this drug being prevention only i dont think it will ever reach the market unless it proves completely devoid of side effects and reaches a very high percentage of effectiveness long term, something like 90% of patients keeping all their hair.
We already have good prevention options but the more the merrier
-
I wouldn't say drugs that can effect someones sexual health and cognitive health are good prevention options for a cosmetic issue.
-
Originally Posted by FearTheLoss
I wouldn't say drugs that can effect someones sexual health and cognitive health are good prevention options for a cosmetic issue.
There are good long term dut and fin studies showing a low incidence of sides, something like 8% i think.
Like i said, i want this compound to succeed but they will have to prove very solid long term if their selling point is prevention
-
Originally Posted by Joker
There are a few very important points from the conference call that have not been discussed.
(1) POC will take place - and I am quoting directly from the webcast - "over the next two years." This is distinctly different from a Phase 2 POC process that takes two years to complete. Even in a best-case-scenario (say, if the trial started tomorrow and lasted between 6 months and 1 year), data and information from the trial would still become available "over the next two years." This is nothing to be disappointed about. It appears as though they are moving as fast as is practicable in a highly regulated industry.
(2) Speaking of the starting date of the trial, the company representatives repeatedly stated that the trial would commence in "late 2015 or early 2016." Somehow, the "late 2015" portion of these statements has been ignored by members of this thread. Again, this is nothing to be disappointed about. Purchasing a novel compound and trialing that compound in humans within the same year it was purchased is certainly quick progress.
(3) It was stated - no less than two times by two different company representatives - that Kythera is considering and is intent on pursuing avenues to expedite the approval process of Kyth-105. This means that there is at least some possibility that the process of commercialization will move faster than even the very favorable timelines heretofore presented. They stated that they may devote additional resources to this project if additional resources (combined with the science itself and the authority of relevant regulatory bodies) ultimately enable them to move more quickly.
(4) This is designed to be a "hair loss prevention" treatment. It will be administered orally.
(5) They understand the size of the market they are hoping to serve and are well acquainted with the failings of current treatments.
Let's be careful with our blunt and overly pessimistic reductions of the facts. No one is perfectly satisfied with this process, and we all need to treat every potential new treatment with a great deal of caution, but we certainly shouldn't depress our emotions over objectively positive news. Hang in there.
Thanks for the information.
-
Originally Posted by Tenma
There are good long term dut and fin studies showing a low incidence of sides, something like 8% i think.
Like i said, i want this compound to succeed but they will have to prove very solid long term if their selling point is prevention
It's likely that it will provide some regrowth, perhaps lots with some wounding/dermarolling.
-
Originally Posted by FearTheLoss
I wouldn't say drugs that can effect someones sexual health and cognitive health are good prevention options for a cosmetic issue.
True, also the people who tout it as a "miracle" can only do so, because so far, it's the only thing that really works. That's not a miracle, that's just your only option right now.
I wouldn't be on this forum if bim was in the market right now. Could cut my fin dose and frequency way down, and maintain with something else. The fact that it's 2015 and it's the only thing that really works, is god damn silly.
-
I thought this might work better then just prevention because CB will be out in a few years and its hard for me to believe that CB wont prevent MPB. If you combined fin and CB you might not ever lose hair again so what will this do better than those in terms of prevention? It just seems odd to release this and CB when both do almost the same thing and do it very effectively assuming CB actually works out.
Similar Threads
-
By RockyMtn in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 12
Last Post: 03-10-2015, 11:57 AM
-
By It's2014ComeOnAlready in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 262
Last Post: 03-01-2015, 05:58 PM
-
By sdsurfin in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 40
Last Post: 02-12-2015, 10:47 PM
-
By Kiwi in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 642
Last Post: 04-26-2013, 05:51 PM
-
By sebasmarin in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 9
Last Post: 10-09-2012, 11:14 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks