All these new potential treatments - how excited should we be ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dimoxynil
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 126

    All these new potential treatments - how excited should we be ?

    Basically what the thread title says. Obviously there have been hundreds of let-downs over the years. What makes this current passage of play any different?

    One of these potential products has only released a study on mice. Mice !? I thought we were better than that? I really want to be as positive as I can but I'm struggling to believe the hype.

    Cheers
  • Sogeking
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 497

    #2
    Well people are excited becuase a lot of them have he potential to seriously slow down or halt hair loss with less serious side effects.

    As you know some of them have studies done on mice, but doesn't exclude some minor regrowth in humans.

    Basically if they work they could be a bridge towards low amount of hair loss until the cure comes in 10-15 years.

    So be cautiously optimistic with a healthy dose of scepticism.

    Comment

    • EXprettyboy
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 101

      #3
      SM04554

      OC000459

      Setipiprant

      Follicept

      Bimatoprost

      I'd rather be at the races for a gamble, than flogging the dead horses (fin + minix) we have as it stands!

      Comment

      • deuce
        Senior Member
        • May 2013
        • 210

        #4
        I would be excited if it was 2009. Unfortunately I will be bald in 3+ years when these things come out. But I am excited for my future children. I guess.

        Comment

        • Justinian
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2014
          • 148

          #5
          SM04554 is only taking NW4/NW5 for their trial, so don't count out major re-growth options. Bim too has potential for large amounts of re-growth.

          Comment

          • DanWS
            Member
            • Jul 2013
            • 68

            #6
            The only one I'm really interested in right now is Follicept, because it has an impressive team behind it with a good track record, who are confident of their method, and they're looking to get their product to market this year. What's most exciting is that we'll find out within a couple of months from now if it works or not. It's important to be cautious but I feel more optimistic about Follicept than any other new/future treatment that has come around in the last few years.

            We'll see.

            Comment

            • Notcoolanymore
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2013
              • 2260

              #7
              Originally posted by Dimoxynil
              One of these potential products has only released a study on mice. Mice !? I thought we were better than that?
              Cmon dude, at least the current potential treatments are helping. Mice need hair too.

              Comment

              • Scientalk56
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2012
                • 282

                #8
                Originally posted by Notcoolanymore
                Cmon dude, at least the current potential treatments are helping. Mice need hair too.
                Best comment for the year! Lol

                Comment

                • Keki
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2015
                  • 232

                  #9
                  Originally posted by deuce
                  I would be excited if it was 2009. Unfortunately I will be bald in 3+ years when these things come out. But I am excited for my future children. I guess.
                  You have just to wait the safety trial not the market mass production, then a dermatologist can give you the treatment as off label if nothing works

                  Comment

                  • Scientalk56
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 282

                    #10
                    As you have already said, Potential.. which means nothing to be excited about.. it takes decades for a drug to be approved and be mass produced.

                    Comment

                    • Trenblastoise
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2014
                      • 142

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Scientalk56
                      As you have already said, Potential.. which means nothing to be excited about.. it takes decades for a drug to be approved and be mass produced.
                      I think "potential" is something to be excited about if it is backed up with evidence.

                      Comment

                      • Swooping
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2014
                        • 803

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Trenblastoise
                        I think "potential" is something to be excited about if it is backed up with evidence.
                        What evidence exactly?

                        Comment

                        • Scientalk56
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2012
                          • 282

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Scientalk56
                          As you have already said, Potential.. which means nothing to be excited about.. it takes decades for a drug to be approved and be mass produced.
                          This evidence wont make it available for the public in the short time. Stuff like these take decades. When we're already totally bald in unreversible way, or too old to even care.

                          We should be excited for a drug that has a potential to be mass produced this year. but theres's no such drug. They are all being tested in trials.

                          Comment

                          • Notcoolanymore
                            Senior Member
                            • Jun 2013
                            • 2260

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Swooping
                            What evidence exactly?
                            The evidence that at least somebody is working on a cure I guess. yay.

                            Comment

                            • Trenblastoise
                              Senior Member
                              • Jul 2014
                              • 142

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Swooping
                              What evidence exactly?
                              Stem cell treatments do work, that's why it is being invested in. It's been researched for many many years with lots of progress.

                              Originally posted by Notcoolanymore
                              The evidence that at least somebody is working on a cure I guess. yay.
                              No, that stem cells actually do work. Lots of studies out on that.


                              Originally posted by Swooping
                              Oh ok, I'll come back in 5 years.
                              k

                              Comment

                              Working...