Perhaps it's just cleverly done adverts, but Dr. Umar seems to be at the forefront of BHT work. I was thinking over transplantations and while I'm hesitant to allocate any scalp hair as of right now due to the possibility of further loss, I've got a good deal of body hair that I'd be more than happy to redistribute. I do know that this is primarily left for those of serious norwoods and I'm not saying I'm interested I'm doing this for my whole head. However, I am thinking that if the grafts would take that densely packing body hair in the temples wouldn't be too bad. It'd bolster the hairline and give a decent shape to it.
Another question I have pertains to the donor area. I know that there is only a limited number of grafts available, but it seems as if a lot of HT docs don't really utilize the most of it and leave it relatively thick while only putting relatively sparse amounts of hair up top. Personally speaking, thinner sides and back to a denser top doesn't look half as odd as the opposite, especially in this decade where that seems to be the staple haircut method.
Hopefully the questions make sense as I'm a bit strung out on caffeine from writing research papers here at college.
Another question I have pertains to the donor area. I know that there is only a limited number of grafts available, but it seems as if a lot of HT docs don't really utilize the most of it and leave it relatively thick while only putting relatively sparse amounts of hair up top. Personally speaking, thinner sides and back to a denser top doesn't look half as odd as the opposite, especially in this decade where that seems to be the staple haircut method.
Hopefully the questions make sense as I'm a bit strung out on caffeine from writing research papers here at college.
Comment