Replicel news and answers

[TJT]

With that logic, how did Replicel get the funding while being behind in the race?

Well, what I'm saying is that they probably aren't behind in the race. It stands to reason they were the best bet at this point. It stands to reason that Shiseido would've bought Lauster's technology if it was better. Keep in mind that Shiseido themselves have several top hair loss scientists on their staff; I'm sure they know where Lauster and others are in the race.

[hellouser]

Well, what I'm saying is that they probably aren't behind in the race. It stands to reason they were the best bet at this point. It stands to reason that Shiseido would've bought Lauster's technology if it was better. Keep in mind that Shiseido themselves have several top hair loss scientists on their staff; I'm sure they know where Lauster and others are in the race.

These are assumptions.

[jpar]

Doesn't the world wide scientific community in biotech with hairloss share all their information with each other? Or are they secretive? How else do you patent something without revealing exactly what it is your patenting?

If that's the case than every hairloss company in the world is rivaling each other right?
If that is NOT the case than that means humanity's scientific potential is not living up to it's maximum potential and so then how much money would it take to buy off and aggregate all the smartest minds in the world into one collective shared understanding if Replicel was bought out for pennies on the dollar (4m)

[jpar]

also, what is this on google about UK and India? Anyone have more information on exactly WHAT that is?

[JayM]

also, what is this on google about UK and India? Anyone have more information on exactly WHAT that is?

They are countries

[jpar]

They are countries

http://www.newindianexpress.com/nati...cle2953798.ece

i dont like plugging things I'm really curious what exactly it is and where to get it Is there a blog of skeptics on this, i'm very skeptical but I want to hear other people