+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 79

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    26

    Default CB-03-01 Investor update

    http://www.cosmopharmaceuticals.com/...vestor_day.pdf

    Can anyone make sense of the above? (obvs scroll down to CB-03-01 Alopecia)

    Thank

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    497

    Default

    Not much to say, they expect to finish Phase 3 for acne with CB-03-01 by the end of 2017. And it shows great promise without serious side effects. The vehicle is BID 1% (don't know what this is).

    For alopecia they are taking NW2 - NW5s, mostly NW3 and NW3 vertex to see the results of CB vs. placebo and minox. Phase 2 should finish by the end of this year.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    101

    Default

    The bad news are that the acne product will be released i guess 2018. So 3 more years.
    Although it seems that in 1% concentration can be effective.
    The acne product could be a weapon until the alopecia version join the market.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    172

    Default

    Pretty interesting info.

    My only fear is cosmo not being able to find a partner.

    Also the damn fda demands a f**cking long phase 3

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,568

    Default

    yeah other than the long wait I think the worry is a partner for the money to finish this. A lot of MPB things in the past never were seen through to the end like RU which arguably seemed to work

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    803

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by burtandernie View Post
    yeah other than the long wait I think the worry is a partner for the money to finish this. A lot of MPB things in the past never were seen through to the end like RU which arguably seemed to work
    True. To be honest I don't see CB-03-01 launching off for AGA. But we'll see.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by burtandernie View Post
    yeah other than the long wait I think the worry is a partner for the money to finish this. A lot of MPB things in the past never were seen through to the end like RU which arguably seemed to work
    Not sure about that. Treatments like RU 58841 failed because they couldn't get FDA approval in early stages, no one knows why it didn't get approved. Others like Aderans and Intercytex failed because of the effectivity problems. There weren't that many potential hair loss treatments that we know off. Also there haven't been a lot of possible treatments that got to enter Phase 3 and search for a partner for distribution.

    I don't think they will have much problems to find a partner if effectivity and safety are proven through first two phases.

    I just wish Histogen could find a partner for additional funding.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    427

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sogeking View Post
    Not much to say, they expect to finish Phase 3 for acne with CB-03-01 by the end of 2017. And it shows great promise without serious side effects. The vehicle is BID 1% (don't know what this is).

    For alopecia they are taking NW2 - NW5s, mostly NW3 and NW3 vertex to see the results of CB vs. placebo and minox. Phase 2 should finish by the end of this year.
    BID 1% is not the vehicle. BID means bis in diem which is Latin for twice a day. It's standard pharma terminology.

    So they are applying 1% CB twice a day.

    Re: CB's strength, it doesn't really matter that CB is a slightly weaker AA than others. That just means you may need a higher concentration. The important thing is what happens when it penetrates the skin ie it supposedly quickly degrades to an inactive form. Unlike say flutamide which is a very strong AA but has systemic effects.

    I don't recall Cosmo ever saying CB causes massive new hair growth. The pilot study showed an increase in hair count but that doesn't mean new hairs, it just means more hairs in anagen, which means more hairs at any given time. It won't cause much new growth anyway. AAs do not grow new hair. They don't even really reverse miniaturisation except in very early or very rare cases. It should significantly outperform Propecia though, because Propecia only lowers scalp DHT by about 30%. CB should beat that comfortably, and block T as well as DHT.

    The best way to think of CB is basically the same as RU but more stable. And also quality control assured of it gets released officially.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pate View Post
    BID 1% is not the vehicle. BID means bis in diem which is Latin for twice a day. It's standard pharma terminology.

    So they are applying 1% CB twice a day.

    Re: CB's strength, it doesn't really matter that CB is a slightly weaker AA than others. That just means you may need a higher concentration. The important thing is what happens when it penetrates the skin ie it supposedly quickly degrades to an inactive form. Unlike say flutamide which is a very strong AA but has systemic effects.

    I don't recall Cosmo ever saying CB causes massive new hair growth. The pilot study showed an increase in hair count but that doesn't mean new hairs, it just means more hairs in anagen, which means more hairs at any given time. It won't cause much new growth anyway. AAs do not grow new hair. They don't even really reverse miniaturisation except in very early or very rare cases. It should significantly outperform Propecia though, because Propecia only lowers scalp DHT by about 30%. CB should beat that comfortably, and block T as well as DHT.

    The best way to think of CB is basically the same as RU but more stable. And also quality control assured of it gets released officially.
    I highly doubt cb wil ever be released. All AA's will cause side effects. I hope I'm wrong, but I believe that's the truth.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    713

    Default

    I don't think there's any point to CB. The PGD2 blockers will be more useful for maintenance, and things like SM or BIM seem much more promising re-growth wise. I doubt the side effect profile for CB is too bad, but I also don't think it'll be all that useful.

Similar Threads

  1. Update
    By Agem in forum Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy (PRP)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-14-2013, 05:40 AM
  2. Update
    By guygroomes12 in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-11-2013, 07:09 PM
  3. So when's the next update...
    By Breaking Bald in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-15-2012, 09:24 PM
  4. hsc update
    By matlondon in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 02-22-2012, 03:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By SarahCarter
Yesterday 04:24 PM
Scar Grafting with Dr Cole
06-21-2012 02:00 PM
Last Post By northeastguy
Yesterday 10:14 AM
Misinformation Online - The Bald Truth, Friday April 19th, 2024
04-19-2024 02:36 PM
Last Post By JoeTillman
04-19-2024 02:36 PM
purchase requisition in business central
12-19-2023 05:38 AM
Last Post By David9232
04-19-2024 11:39 AM
An inconvenient truth about FUE
04-19-2024 07:24 AM
Last Post By Dr. Lindsey
04-19-2024 07:24 AM