-
Why do they need FDA approval? This is an italian firm.....they could release it in any country right?
-
Originally Posted by sdsurfin
I don't think there's any point to CB. The PGD2 blockers will be more useful for maintenance, and things like SM or BIM seem much more promising re-growth wise. I doubt the side effect profile for CB is too bad, but I also don't think it'll be all that useful.
Maybe but your basically guessing. I dont think any of the past small studies they have done nor people buying chemicals from unlicensed manufacturers and experimenting on their own is actually a good representation of the effectiveness of the actual final product or chemical. The better safety profile is one of the biggest advantages to it even if its no better than fin.
Similar Threads
-
By Agem in forum Platelet Rich Plasma Therapy (PRP)
Replies: 4
Last Post: 05-14-2013, 05:40 AM
-
By guygroomes12 in forum Introduce Yourself & Share Your Story
Replies: 5
Last Post: 01-11-2013, 07:09 PM
-
By Breaking Bald in forum Men's Hair Loss: Start Your Own Topic
Replies: 3
Last Post: 10-15-2012, 09:24 PM
-
By matlondon in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
Replies: 30
Last Post: 02-22-2012, 03:24 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
» IAHRS
» The Bald Truth
» americanhairloss.org
|
Bookmarks