Replicel's update 23 October 2014

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • garethbale
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 605

    #76
    I'm wary of Replicel's future. Looking at their last audited financial accounts, and the current year's interim ones, there is a question mark over their ability to continue.

    They are massively dependent on future funding and their expenses so far have made them massively loss making. I just hope that they can get their products released in the future.

    Comment

    • JDW
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2012
      • 108

      #77
      Any word on Replicel's presentation at the stem cell summit this week?

      Comment

      • lmg7
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2014
        • 16

        #78
        Scientists at the University of Calgary have identified a certain type of stem cells they say could one day lead to a treatment for male pattern baldness.

        Comment

        • hellouser
          Senior Member
          • May 2012
          • 4423

          #79
          My thoughts on this can be seen in my reply here:

          Originally posted by hellouser
          So basically this is the same work from Dr. Rolf Hoffmann and Dr. Kevin McElwee from... you guessed it, Replicel.

          However, if you watch the video you'll get a wicked laugh;

          1) The video starts off by ignoring people with actual alopecia and go STRAIGHT to cancer patients (again, men with AGA don't deserve sympathy)
          2) They've been working on a knockoff of Replicel's method for 4 years..... LOL
          3) Dr. Biernaskie says it will be at 5+ years before he knows if it works..... LOOOOL
          4) The woman that sells wigs for cancer patients says its not far away...... LOOOOOOOOOL
          5) Eventhough they dont knwo if it works, its 10 years for clinical trials...? LOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!!

          Scroll down and read the comments too. Even after the video SPECIFICALLY ignores AGA and tries to build sympathy using chemo patients, people STILL mock the situation and call it vanity.

          Nice find by Dr. Biernaskie... except it's been done already.

          Comment

          • noisette
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2013
            • 260

            #80
            It's not Replicel's team

            Comment

            • noisette
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2013
              • 260

              #81
              Replicel's presentation on The Worl stem Cell 2014

              Originally posted by JDW
              Any word on Replicel's presentation at the stem cell summit this week?

              Here is the Replicel's presentation on The Worl stem Cell 2014 event :

              Comment

              • noisette
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2013
                • 260

                #82
                Originally posted by hellouser
                My thoughts on this can be seen in my reply here:
                Héhéhé You are Right and this make me laughing too looool

                Comment

                • rambo007
                  Member
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 43

                  #83
                  Little feedback from Replicel on Twitter:

                  @CrashOverHead manuf. issues now resolved. Rep and Shiseido moving quickly for P2 trial. Product likely to be available in Japan before EU.

                  Comment

                  • Swooping
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2014
                    • 803

                    #84
                    Sorry if I missed this but are any results actually published of efficiency? And if so what are they?

                    Comment

                    • noisette
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2013
                      • 260

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Swooping
                      Sorry if I missed this but are any results actually published of efficiency? And if so what are they?
                      Hi Swooping



                      page 4

                      Comment

                      • Trouse5858
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2014
                        • 169

                        #86
                        Read the 'risk factors' on page 9. Sounds pretty discouraging to me that they classify a 'high risk' of not commercializing these products due to efficacy and regulatory concerns.

                        Comment

                        • macbeth81
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2014
                          • 101

                          #87
                          They have "risk factors" in all their MD&A publications for the last several years. I don't know if this is something required by the SEC, but I am not surprised to see it in a stock report. I wouldn't be too discouraged. It is not a statement on whether RCH-01 work but a general CYA statement.

                          Comment

                          • noisette
                            Senior Member
                            • Jun 2013
                            • 260

                            #88
                            Originally posted by Trouse5858
                            Read the 'risk factors' on page 9. Sounds pretty discouraging to me that they classify a 'high risk' of not commercializing these products due to efficacy and regulatory concerns.
                            It's normal but Replicel's technology works in phase 1, Shiseido is in game too . It's for FDA's rules I presume. Don't forget the recent japan's law about stem cell. Phase 2 would be working like for Histogen. Not reasons to be discourage bro

                            Comment

                            • brocktherock
                              Senior Member
                              • Dec 2013
                              • 205

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Trouse5858
                              Read the 'risk factors' on page 9. Sounds pretty discouraging to me that they classify a 'high risk' of not commercializing these products due to efficacy and regulatory concerns.
                              There were people with almost 20% increase in six months though in the pilot study. That's quite a bit better than finasteride and minoxidil. I think if you mixed fin min and rep you would be essentially cured.

                              Comment

                              • hellouser
                                Senior Member
                                • May 2012
                                • 4423

                                #90
                                Originally posted by brocktherock
                                There were people with almost 20% increase in six months though in the pilot study. That's quite a bit better than finasteride and minoxidil. I think if you mixed fin min and rep you would be essentially cured.
                                Histogen after Replicel might work better;

                                New injected cells plus histogen's growth factors.... that could be real interesting. I wish the two biotechs collaborated and did a single case study.

                                Comment

                                Working...