+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    San francisco & Toronto
    Posts
    5

    Default I got better results with non FDA approved products but how?

    Hi,

    I've actually been receding and thinning at the crown for about 5 years now. I WAS probably a NW3V but have managed my crown issue. i've scoured the forums and haven't participated but have been reading. I've tried propecia, rogaine and read several ebooks. they helped maintain my then current status but I expected to get thicker hair. I also tried several alternative options that i've read up on. i've seen way more results with those than the FDA approved stuff.

    I've worked several years in the canadian OTC (Over the counter drugs) industry and was wondering how the FDA goes about selecting and testing specific drugs for their respective purposes. My question is, why did the FDA choose minoxidil and finasteride to do clinical trials and not all the other alternative options? My guess is it's because those two actives are backed by large CPG/Pharma companies and the alternatives are just home remedies with no dollars behind them to fund/lobby for testing.

    I'd love to get some confirmation/counters on my hypothesis based on my personal experience as someone that worked in the canadian OTC/Pharma industry (Health Canada has a way more stringent criteria before releasing products to the canadian market) for years and am coping with thinning and receding (getting better results with alternative products).

    Everyone in the forums always shut down the suggestion of non fda products but i wonder if anyone actually knows why only two products have been approved.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    924

    Default

    Pictures please.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    San francisco & Toronto
    Posts
    5

    Default

    yeah sure. i just got a new phone. i dug through my emails to see if i can find some as i often send myself the photos as a log. i found the one of my receding line after 6 months of my regimen. i have some hairs that are now thicker and more visible in my frontal area. the crown is the biggest improvement. let me dig for those photos. it's on the sd card of my old phone.

    How come i can't just upload/attach a picture? i need to use a hyperlink? Wow, the tech used for this forum is old school. I'm trying to upload a split image as my profile pic so you can see it but i can't even do that. I'm in the tech industry and can't seem to figure this out. maybe i'm a little slow today. is it because i'm a junior member?

    Do you have any answers to my actual question about the FDA approval process/selection?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    924

    Default

    Because FDA approved products do work and were proven to work. And because all the rest is BS and garbage that doesn't do anything.

    You'll never ever ever find legitimate before/after pictures who are the result of a non FDA approved product anywhere.

    It's common sense, just saying.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    San francisco & Toronto
    Posts
    5

    Default

    ah stupid me. hold on. i found how to attach the pics

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    San francisco & Toronto
    Posts
    5

    Default

    but that's an anecdotal response. I'm looking into the actual selection process of the FDA. How do they pick and choose which actives/products to test. They're a government branch that doesn't have endless funding to test just anything. could you imagine if they had to go about testing every submission that said they had the cure for the common cold? that alone could take up all of their resources. From my experience, the ones with the biggest $$ backing get priority in testing. It was also part of the marketing departments responsibility to make sure the FDA like approvals were done prior to launch FOR marketing purposes.

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    San francisco & Toronto
    Posts
    5

    Default I call it my new hair island

    6 months after my regimen. nonetheless, i'm looking for answers around the FDA selection process since everyone seems to negate alternative options
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	20140427_135216.jpg

Size:	92.9 KB
ID:	35367   Click image for larger version

Name:	20141002_104817.jpg

Size:	91.1 KB
ID:	35368  
    Last edited by akim83; 10-15-2014 at 09:51 AM. Reason: grammar

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    924

    Default

    No before pictures. These are useless.

  9. #9
    Doctor Representative 35YrsAfter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Alpharetta, GA
    Posts
    1,361

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by akim83 View Post
    but that's an anecdotal response. I'm looking into the actual selection process of the FDA. How do they pick and choose which actives/products to test. They're a government branch that doesn't have endless funding to test just anything. could you imagine if they had to go about testing every submission that said they had the cure for the common cold? that alone could take up all of their resources. From my experience, the ones with the biggest $$ backing get priority in testing. It was also part of the marketing departments responsibility to make sure the FDA like approvals were done prior to launch FOR marketing purposes.
    The FDA doesn't "pick" drugs they want the public to use, instead a company with a medical device or drug goes through a Clearance process or The FDA Approval process. Companies must be able to prove their device or drug is safe and can actually do what the applicant claims. Often at a very great expense to the company.

    From the FDA Website

    35YrsAfter also posts as CITNews and works at Dr. Cole's office - Cole Hair Transplant, 1045 Powers Place, Alpharetta, Georgia 30009 - Phone 678-566-1011
    The contents of my posts are my opinions and not medical advice
    Last edited by 35YrsAfter; 02-22-2015 at 07:52 PM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Notcoolanymore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    A place hot as hell
    Posts
    2,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fred970 View Post
    No before pictures. These are useless.
    Good evidence. I am sold.

Similar Threads

  1. Hair Cloning Restoration Procedures Studies Approved
    By gmonasco in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-08-2015, 12:54 PM
  2. Will RU ever get FDA Approved or is it purely experimental?
    By joel203 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-25-2014, 04:02 PM
  3. New FDA approved drug?
    By Gjm127 in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-29-2012, 06:28 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-17-2009, 01:14 PM
  5. Laser FDA Approved?
    By mikey79 in forum Hair Loss Treatments
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-17-2009, 10:00 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

Sun Exposure after Hair Transplant
02-26-2009 02:36 PM
Last Post By gisecit34
Today 09:59 AM
Surgeons in SE Asia (Thailand)
10-20-2018 10:30 AM
by martino
Last Post By EFab
Today 08:34 AM
My FUE Into FUT Scar Result Revealed After 5 Years
04-15-2024 10:10 AM
Last Post By JoeTillman
04-15-2024 10:10 AM
2 operations with Asmed, Dr. Erdogan - 2007 and 2016
10-06-2020 10:53 AM
Last Post By sicore8826
04-12-2024 02:41 PM