UW professor may have found cure to hair loss from chemotherapy

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chef789
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 5

    UW professor may have found cure to hair loss from chemotherapy

    MADISON, Wis. -
    Lynn Malayter was shocked enough to be diagnosed with breast cancer almost two years ago. She never thought she would have to endure chemotherapy, but with the odds of recurrence stacked against her, Malayter went through about a year of treatments.

    “2013 was a challenge, but we overcame it,” Malayter said.

    When Malayter started losing her hair, her husband helped by shaving her bald. She remembered it being cold and an inherent need to cover her head. She got scarves, hats, and wigs.

    “To maintain a sense of normalcy would have been really nice,” Malayter said.

    Led by UW oncology professor William Fahl, a preclinical study could help chemotherapy patients get a step closer to that normalcy.

    Fahl came across the discovery accidentally. He was testing how effective another drug was for preventing hair loss during chemotherapy and radiation when he found a vasoconstrictor can help save the hair follicles of those going through those treatments.

    The drug - also found in Novocain and similar numbing agents at dentist offices – can restrict blood flow to an area of skin. When used to eliminate feeling in your gums, Fahl said the vasoconstrictor is keeping the injected anesthetic in a particular spot.

    Fahl suggested that applying the ingredient topically to the scalp could protect hair follicles from the chemotherapy, and therefore prevent hair loss.

    “The blood vessels lay a few, about a millimeter below the surface. So by topically applying it, you constrict those blood vessels and in the process, without detail, you essentially diminish the amount of chemotherapy that's delivered to that thin film of tissue, and that tissue basically holds all of the stem cells for the hair follicle as well as the skin, so you're protecting them,” Fahl explained.

    Fahl said in a time when other studies are pushing for more chemotherapy, preventing some of the most hated side effects of treatment becomes even more important.

    “Our goal is that in 10 years, people go to their oncologist with the clear expectation of having their cancers cured and do so in a manner that's consistent with their life,” Fahl said.

    As the treatment continues to be tested, Fahl hopes more funding will soon be offered to push it through the necessary phases
  • chef789
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 5

    #2

    Comment

    • inbrugge
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2013
      • 244

      #3
      interesting read, but it doesn't have any connection to MPB/AGA. It's just a way to basically 'isolate' your hair from the chemotherapy so that it doesn't fall out fue to the radiative treatment. It's great news for cancer patients. God help them.

      Comment

      • cichlidfort
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2013
        • 262

        #4
        Why is it that the most common type of hair loss is the last one to have any advanced cures or even a freaking mere solution to stop it? Seems that every other type of hair loss has now been accounted for, except AGA. Dammit, this shit sucks.

        Comment

        • baldozer
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2012
          • 752

          #5
          Originally posted by cichlidfort
          Why is it that the most common type of hair loss is the last one to have any advanced cures or even a freaking mere solution to stop it? Seems that every other type of hair loss has now been accounted for, except AGA. Dammit, this shit sucks.
          LOL! I was also thinking the same. Perhaps, that is, because its the most difficult to cure. Secondly, women are not affected by it. If women were affected by such thing, the priority to cure it would be much higher for sure.

          Comment

          • hellouser
            Senior Member
            • May 2012
            • 4423

            #6
            Originally posted by cichlidfort
            Why is it that the most common type of hair loss is the last one to have any advanced cures or even a freaking mere solution to stop it? Seems that every other type of hair loss has now been accounted for, except AGA. Dammit, this shit sucks.
            It's because the other forms of Alopecia affect women just as much as it does men, hence the priority for it. Men's health is often times seen as a joke; you'll have men and women laugh about a guy with testicular cancer and society will condone it but you will NEVER hear about a woman with breast cancer getting laughed at.

            Want proof of the sexist mentality society has for men's health issues? Watch this:



            The whole panel of women, including the audience LAUGHS at a man for 5 minutes for having his penis cut off by his wife.

            Do you think if a woman had her tits cut off anyone would laugh at that?

            Comment

            • 2young2bald
              Junior Member
              • May 2014
              • 28

              #7
              Originally posted by hellouser
              It's because the other forms of Alopecia affect women just as much as it does men, hence the priority for it. Men's health is often times seen as a joke; you'll have men and women laugh about a guy with testicular cancer and society will condone it but you will NEVER hear about a woman with breast cancer getting laughed at.

              Want proof of the sexist mentality society has for men's health issues? Watch this:



              The whole panel of women, including the audience LAUGHS at a man for 5 minutes for having his penis cut off by his wife.

              Do you think if a woman had her tits cut off anyone would laugh at that?[/U]
              I would laugh if it were their tits...

              Comment

              • hellouser
                Senior Member
                • May 2012
                • 4423

                #8
                Originally posted by 2young2bald
                I would laugh if it were their tits...
                I wouldn't. There's nothing funny about anyone's misfortune of their physical or psychological well being.

                Comment

                • 2young2bald
                  Junior Member
                  • May 2014
                  • 28

                  #9
                  Originally posted by hellouser
                  I wouldn't. There's nothing funny about anyone's misfortune of their physical or psychological well being.
                  You get what I mean I think.

                  Comment

                  • 2young2bald
                    Junior Member
                    • May 2014
                    • 28

                    #10
                    Originally posted by baldozer
                    LOL! I was also thinking the same. Perhaps, that is, because its the most difficult to cure. Secondly, women are not affected by it. If women were affected by such thing, the priority to cure it would be much higher for sure.
                    Actually 40% of hair loss sufferers in the US are women, they problems are that that fact is keeping hidden and I think that most of them don't lose their hair when they are between the age 16-28.

                    Comment

                    • HairIsLife
                      Member
                      • Aug 2014
                      • 96

                      #11
                      Originally posted by 2young2bald
                      Actually 40% of hair loss sufferers in the US are women, they problems are that that fact is keeping hidden and I think that most of them don't lose their hair when they are between the age 16-28.
                      Don't believe those statistics. Apparently 2/3 men by the age of 35 have hair loss, which is a clear load of shit considering the well known statistics say that 3/10 (30%) men deal with hair loss in their thirties, not 2/3 (66%). Take a walk outside and you'll see that majority of men below 40 still have full heads of hair. Those AHLA statistics are far from being accurate.

                      Comment

                      • cichlidfort
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2013
                        • 262

                        #12
                        Originally posted by HairIsLife
                        Don't believe those statistics. Apparently 2/3 men by the age of 35 have hair loss, which is a clear load of shit considering the well known statistics say that 3/10 (30%) men deal with hair loss in their thirties, not 2/3 (66%). Take a walk outside and you'll see that majority of men below 40 still have full heads of hair. Those AHLA statistics are far from being accurate.
                        2/3 deal with SOME type of hairloss. Doesn't have to be full blown bald or terrible recession. Balding starts somewhere ya know.

                        Comment

                        • HairIsLife
                          Member
                          • Aug 2014
                          • 96

                          #13
                          The average male has a 4 in 7 chance of getting MPB, that's 57% of men with MPB and 43% of men without MPB.

                          How is it even possible that 66% of men would be balding by age 35 when it doesn't even affect that many men ? It's a load of shit. Yeah, SOME degree of hair loss, still the statistics are overblown. 43% of men don't even have the gene.

                          Comment

                          • baldozer
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2012
                            • 752

                            #14
                            Originally posted by HairIsLife
                            The average male has a 4 in 7 chance of getting MPB, that's 57% of men with MPB and 43% of men without MPB.

                            How is it even possible that 66% of men would be balding by age 35 when it doesn't even affect that many men ? It's a load of shit. Yeah, SOME degree of hair loss, still the statistics are overblown. 43% of men don't even have the gene.
                            Those 43% men you are talking about, are probably the low testosterone, high estrogen, narrow shouldered and wide hips guys with barely any facial hair. Those men obviously don't bald because they are too feminine. I would rather be bald and masculine than a low T feminine guy with a feminine hairline and a baby face.

                            Comment

                            • hellouser
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2012
                              • 4423

                              #15
                              Originally posted by HairIsLife
                              Don't believe those statistics. Apparently 2/3 men by the age of 35 have hair loss, which is a clear load of shit considering the well known statistics say that 3/10 (30%) men deal with hair loss in their thirties, not 2/3 (66%). Take a walk outside and you'll see that majority of men below 40 still have full heads of hair. Those AHLA statistics are far from being accurate.
                              I gotta agree with this. I'm the youngest guy in the entire building at work (with many departments). There are only a handful of men with hair loss in my building and yet I'm the only one out of maybe 100+ people with a NW3 hairline. There are bald guys, but they're all old; 50 years and up.

                              This also applies to my friends as well. Damn near every guy I know that is my age, younger or even older is either NW1 or NW2. The number of bald or balding guys I know is minimal. Out of 153 male friends of mine I counted only 25 with visible hair loss (so basically, NW3 or higher, as NW2 is sometimes difficult to spot). Mind you, some of the guys we're significantly older as well, but also out of the 153 total there were many other older men as well.

                              I cannot believe that 66% figure when I see men around me and the number is more around 16%.

                              Comment

                              Working...