Lets Get CB-03-01 DONE. We are SO close.

[joel203]

Next few decades? Dude if you're that pessimistic don't even bother reasoning in this section of hairloss.

Next few decades is not pessimistic, realistic. Never is pessimistic or next few centuries

[cichlidfort]

Next few decades is not pessimistic, realistic. Never is pessimistic or next few centuries

To correct us both, it's actually speculation, neither pessimistic nor realistic. However, if you're a fan of recent science, which it seems your moronic self is not, it's an educated prediction to say the cure is within the 10 year mark. Saying it won't happen in the next few decades is a vague guess that could imply 20-40 years away. 20-40 years away with the discoveries that have been recently made? What a ****ing joke.

[hellouser]

To correct us both, it's actually speculation, neither pessimistic nor realistic. However, if you're a fan of recent science, which it seems your moronic self is not, it's an educated prediction to say the cure is within the 10 year mark. Saying it won't happen in the next few decades is a vague guess that could imply 20-40 years away. 20-40 years away with the discoveries that have been recently made? What a ****ing joke.

I fell out of my chair when I read that.

[joel203]

To correct us both, it's actually speculation, neither pessimistic nor realistic. However, if you're a fan of recent science, which it seems your moronic self is not, it's an educated prediction to say the cure is within the 10 year mark. Saying it won't happen in the next few decades is a vague guess that could imply 20-40 years away. 20-40 years away with the discoveries that have been recently made? What a ****ing joke.

Woah chill out brah it'll only accelerate your hair loss

[ShookOnes]

To correct us both, it's actually speculation, neither pessimistic nor realistic. However, if you're a fan of recent science, which it seems your moronic self is not, it's an educated prediction to say the cure is within the 10 year mark. Saying it won't happen in the next few decades is a vague guess that could imply 20-40 years away. 20-40 years away with the discoveries that have been recently made? What a ****ing joke.

20-40 years is one hell of a human achievement tho bra it'd be amazing if it did happen

[sdsurfin]

To correct us both, it's actually speculation, neither pessimistic nor realistic. However, if you're a fan of recent science, which it seems your moronic self is not, it's an educated prediction to say the cure is within the 10 year mark. Saying it won't happen in the next few decades is a vague guess that could imply 20-40 years away. 20-40 years away with the discoveries that have been recently made? What a ****ing joke.

I'd say next few decades for a real cure is very realistic based on the current science. Testing takes a decade and they are nowhere near testing anything close to a cure. When they are able to create a terminal hair then they will be approaching testing. got a long way to go til that happens, and then they have to figure out how to make it all work in a balding scalp with concurrent therapies that do not exist yet. don't hold your breath.

[hellouser]

I'd say next few decades for a real cure is very realistic based on the current science. Testing takes a decade and they are nowhere near testing anything close to a cure. When they are able to create a terminal hair then they will be approaching testing. got a long way to go til that happens, and then they have to figure out how to make it all work in a balding scalp with concurrent therapies that do not exist yet. don't hold your breath.

I don't get this. Why 10 years to 'test' when they get a working follicle growing terminal hairs? Wouldn't that already qualify as a 'test' ? And why 10 years to 'test' ? Why not 8? or 9? Or 11? And what does 10 years tell us that 2 or 3 years does not?

I'll tell you this: the whole industry is making a joke out of us. These timelines are outrageous... I don't know why you guys just shrug it off like it's supposed to be tolerated.

[KJ1982]

Apologies for the off-topic post, but I was just wondering if you would mind my getting in touch off the forums, hellouser; I'd send a private message though they're no longer active if I remember correctly.

Many thanks.

KJ.

[burtandernie]

I want to see a study of CB being used on facial hair or body hair what effects it has. Does it prevent body hair from ever growing or does it completely reverse body hair growth? If you stop not just DHT but also T from getting to the hair does it continue to grow and if it does what else fuels it?

[joel203]

I want to see a study of CB being used on facial hair or body hair what effects it has. Does it prevent body hair from ever growing or does it completely reverse body hair growth? If you stop not just DHT but also T from getting to the hair does it continue to grow and if it does what else fuels it?

I don't see how it'll affect body hair if it's already grown, maybe areas that have started growth yet? It will be cool if it did I could do wih less body hair!