Gho's files patent for Hair multiplication - Page 2 - BaldTruthTalk.com
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 20 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 198
  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    94

    Default

    Very interesting post Arash, thanks for this.

    For me, assuming Gho is being honest is this:

    "In addition, the methods of the present invention offers other great advantages over the existing hair multiplication methods, including greater hair density per transplant unit as well as improved aesthetic results, i.e. the achievement of more realistic and natural looking results. This is achievable because the methods of the present invention not only provides greater hair density per hair implant in the recipient area (e.g. scalp) but also allow the natural regrowth of the plucked hair in the donor area, which guarantees no hair density loss in the donor region of a subject. Furthermore, because the perforations (i.e. punctures made by the plucking and implanting needle) made to harvest and implant donor hairs are very small (pore size <1 mm), both harvest and implant locations are undistinguishable from the surrounding (unprocessed) areas. As a result, hair grafts can be placed much more tightly together, in a manner that mimic natural hair arrangement, so as to avoid undesirable (unnatural looking) effects such as "bunching effects".

    This essentially would revolutionise hair transplantation IF it can be implemented as stated, and IF it is as effective as stated. It would be both scarless, not affect the donor area and also be much more efficacious.

    It's hard to believe this as it sounds like a panacea.

  2. #12
    Senior Member Arashi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3,888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JJJJrS View Post
    My guess is that he's going to use this for marketing and maybe patent trolling when a procedure like this becomes feasible in the future.
    Agreed, at this point I think he's just using it for marketing and wont offer it to clients (for the obvious reason that it's quite difficult to fake and I'm leaning huge to the possibility that he's just bluffing, as usual)

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arashi View Post
    Agreed, at this point I think he's just using it for marketing and wont offer it to clients (for the obvious reason that it's quite difficult to fake and I'm leaning huge to the possibility that he's just bluffing, as usual)
    It's a big stretch isn't it? He's claiming a multiplication rate of 10x when we know for a typical HST procedure, HASCI isn't even getting close to 2x. So naturally, I'm very, very skeptical of a claim like that.

    Everybody knows that the best way to prove a procedure like this works is to demonstrate it. It wouldn't be hard at all to extract a hair, split it up 10 times, and keep track of the implanted hairs and the extraction point. The fact that we yet again fail to see any evidence tells me a lot.

    Either way, it will be interesting to see what becomes of all this. I don't think he'll be able to dance around it like he's done with HST.

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    67

    Default

    ..."offers other great advantages over the existing hair multiplication methods"

    What other hair multiplication methods, this falsly implies that there are other multiplication methods on the market but his new techniqie is much betta

    Anybody contacted them to find out pricing for this revolutionary hm?
    Sounds like gho figured it out

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    226

    Default

    Just incase anyone browsing this thread isn't aware. I think pretty much everyone here is being sarcastic. Gho has repeatedly refused efforts to verify any of his extravagant claims.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    492

    Default

    woooow if it's real, I am in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    492

    Default

    where did you find that?

    I know I am wishfull thinking but what if Gho and HASCI remained silent on our critics, took them into account and improved theri technique to offer us real hair multiplication?

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    804

    Default

    Gho? Man his aesthetic results are terrible and his claims are even worse. Please .

  9. #19
    Senior Member Arashi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    3,888

    Default

    Agreed.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    492

    Default

    if you are so sure it is crap and lies, why do you even bother bringing the subject?
    (simple question)


    I think you are right saying that so far, they were not really cooperating, but I also can imagine that instead of spending their energy in fights with the public, they rather worked on improving and going further.

    They might have been conscious that the actual HST has too much flaws.

    I think it's intellectually dishonest to say that HST is crap!!! look at Gaz results, his donor still looks great, Gerard Joling does not wear a wig anymore, he makes pics of him in swimming pool, in the Caribbean water, full sun light and it's OK!!!Whay about Wesley Sneider???!!! guyzzz, did you see hilm in Workd Cup!!!???
    For me HST is the best but dark points are price so high and terrible communication with us when difficult questions arrive!!!

    So why would it be so crazy to think that, instead of foruming here, they worked on doing better and better while providing their doubling and project to bring out later a real multiplication that would shut mouths up?!!

    I don't know, it makes sense also, you get huge money from your actual technique, you invest it in researches, to make better and build a monopole on hair restoration, but the real one, not the crap and non sense FUE proposed in worldwide clinics!

Similar Threads

  1. Ds Healthcare files New Patent
    By BDDFreak in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-11-2014, 10:09 PM
  2. Hair multiplication?
    By DepressedByHairLoss in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-30-2013, 05:46 AM
  3. Dr Gho hair multiplication studies
    By caddarik79 in forum Techniques in Possible Donor Regeneration and Multiplication
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-01-2013, 05:37 AM
  4. Hair Cloning/Multiplication
    By FearTheLoss in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 02-21-2013, 07:43 PM
  5. Hair Multiplication
    By BoSox in forum Cutting Edge / Future Treatments
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-01-2011, 05:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

» IAHRS

hair transplant surgeons

» The Bald Truth

» Recent Threads

Delayed Hair Loss ?? :(
Today 05:01 PM
by bolt24
Last Post By bolt24
Today 05:01 PM
Being healthy is more important than having hair!
Today 01:26 PM
Last Post By FlightTL
Today 01:26 PM
Your opinion please! :) :) Is it balding?receding??
01-14-2018 09:18 AM
Last Post By angelos13
Today 12:52 PM
18 years old and balding or thinning please let me know
01-14-2018 10:22 AM
by adzelg
Last Post By BaldBearded
Today 07:33 AM
Dr Rahal - 2005 Grafts - FUE
Today 06:05 AM
by mattj
Last Post By mattj
Today 06:05 AM